How Does Light Graffiti Work?

Why does the double slit experiment work for natural light?

  • The original double-slit experiment worked with natural light. However, the explanations for the interference pattern make the most sense for coherent light such as a laser. In fact, laser light is usually recommended for the experiment. Why does natural light still interfere in the same way? The explanation I am referring to uses the fact that coherent light contains photons with all the same phase, making it clear that the light waves coming through each slit can interfere with one another in a reliable way. My understanding is that natural light has photons of all different phases, so we would not expect the light coming through one slit to have a phase that matched up with the phase through the other slit in any particular way. Yet, a predictable interference pattern is still observed. The only explanation which I can think of is that each photon is passing through both slits and interfering with itself. I find this a bit difficult to believe, particularly since the experiment works in open air; but perhaps it is true.

  • Answer:

    Interference phenomena will still happen with incoherent light, provided the range of wavelengths with significant amplitude is not too large, but the interference fringes will appear more indistinct and washed out.  This is because each wavelength of light will individually interfere and if the spread is not too great then the fringes will be at approximately the same locations, so when you add them all together you will still get a pattern. The original Young's slit experiment was done with sunlight.  This has an approximately black-body spectrum.  The width of the blackbody spectrum goes down with the temperature of the source, so using a high temperature source like the sun is better than any of the other light sources that were available at the time, such as candles.

Matthew Saul Leifer at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

You can do the double slit experiment on natural light like Thomas Young did by first making sure the light incident on the double slit is coherent. This is done by passing the light through a single slit first: EDIT: When this is done with sunlight, you get a range of wavelengths interfering with each other, which technically isn't coherent. But you can only see visible light in the interference pattern, and that is relatively small range of wavelengths. It's small enough that the overlapping interference pattern from each wavelength is quite distinct near the central maximum but gets increasingly washed out as you go further out. This is actually what Thomas Young reported in his original experiment [1]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young%27s_interference_experiment

Hongwan Liu

You do indeed need a (more or less) coherent light source, but you can do that with sunlight (natural light). A single slit is used first. This produces roughly coherent (in-phase) light before it reaches the double-slits. You may have noticed that I've not really explained why the first slit gives coherent light, but you may not know why a laser gives coherent light either!Monochromatic light would be better than sunlight because it's best to have light of just one wavelength. However, the wavelengths of the visible-light spectrum are close enough for the experiment to work moderately well with sunlight.In fact, away from the central part of the interference pattern, coloured bands are seen rather than the simple light and dark lines we get with monochromatic light.

Robert Newton

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.