Is the world/universe a sum ZERO of energy?

No. Negative energy is not a real thing, it's just a term used for someone in a bad mood. Positive energy doesn't work the way you think it does. As far as physics is concerned, only potential energy can be negative. The other types - kinetic, chemical, thermal, etc - are positive. The total energy in the universe is positive.

if it were energy, how does it flow to people and make them rich etc? if it were energy, there must be a means as technology to measure it. we can't measure success. this is subjective because we don't want to agree. but it's also objective in terms of achievement, attainment, etc as - material things, education, knowledge, wisdom (insight), understanding, beauty, fame, chance, friends, ... but there is none who has these all perfectly - these days. both success and failure are manmade - both social's and individual's there are social groups, they enrich themselves on the expense of others. Religion, politics, economy, education, social systems ... are run for their own interests. We know it's not possible to have basic needs without a job or a share in the society. These basic needs are food, clothes, somewhere to live, education and medical care. Without land, these things will come from nowhere. We live on earth so we the earth for everything. But how many of us have a piece of earth or land? Naturally people live in a society. Let's start with a village - with a field of crop, a stream of water, nearby woods and a simple means of life. They have their youth who work for hard jobs, elders who still work or looking after the kids, educate them and some retired. Can you see they need no worry? This is communalism. https://www.google.com.au/search?q=communalism&rlz=1C1RNVG_enAU543AU544&oq=communalism&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.2931j0j1&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8 In communalism, everyone has to behave, limit their demands, and take a fair share only. Population must be controlled - limited sex. Everyone must go together and work together - no more no less whether one wants to or not. The balance is very fragile. Once someone starts to want more, of anything, the system will not work. They will have to start dividing land, start ownership, and there will be those whose crops fail and be poor or trade the land for survival, and become labourer later. The right to land must be universal. The right to job and the right to receive these general needs must be universal. But humans are corrupt. We are like this because of that. Even if we had another chance to start with communalism, that way, people would corrupt again. We suffer because of our systems.

You are confusing the "new age" (or the "Law of Attraction") concept of energy with actual energy, which is a measurement of a system's capacity to do work. The universe doesn't work that way, so forget what Deepak Chopra or Oprah tell you - it's baloney.

There is a very good book that dares to say God can be disproved. "God: The Failed Hypothesis" by Victor Stenger. He argues that there is no evidence for the existence of a deity and that God's existence, while not impossible, is improbable. In the book, one scientific argument against the existence of God goes like this: 1. Hypothesize a God that plays an important role in the universe. 2. Assume God has specific attributes that should provide objective evidence tor his existence. 3. Look for such evidence with an open mind. 4. If such evidence is found, conclude that God MAY exist. 5. if such objective evidence is not found, conclude beyond a reasonable doubt, that a God with these properties does NOT exist.

no