Will a Monster 1000 ultra HDMI cable make my DVD picture better?

No. The only difference is that you will have spent way too much money on a HDMI cable. Seriously, the no-brand cables that cost $7-15 work just as good (if not better) than those overpriced cables you see going for $50 or even $150.

NO again, HDMI system's do not need better or high price HDMI cables. The ROI return on investment is not really worth it for most systems. However if you are running cables 10 feet or longer, distances or near lots of radio waves, better cables are a must.

Nope. Well, not better than any other HDMI cable. If you want a cable buy the cheapest one you can find. If we all stick together we can force Monster to stop scamming people into overpaying for HDMI cables.

NO! Don't believe the hype, monster is good but way overpriced. If you don't care about spending money you should get it. Though if money is tight just get a regular brand cable from your retailers. I wouldn't say go to the dollar store but there won't be any noticeable difference. Monster has these gimmicks about signal protection and all that but unless you are spanning long distances past 20 feet you don't have to worry about signal interference or break down at the least.

There is no proof that there is ANY quality difference between using a HD-MI cable that costs £120 or one that costs £10, This was proven on a program called the gadget show. The reason is that it is down to the "DVD" player, the cable only carries the quality that the DVD player can give out and again, the TV can only display qualities that it can. The cable has nothing to do with the quality really.

I,ll have to disagree with all these wrong answers, if you to take enough of that cheap junk back to get things working you would know why I,ll only buy the best from now on.