Global Warming Science. What are your thoughts on this article?

Co2 a natural gas in our air Seems to be root of all evil Wrong It is a green house gas and will have a very I mean very minor effect on global temperatures You might what to read the 2009 old farmers almanac. They have printed over 230 years at an 80% + correct record of predicting climate. They predict 50 years of cooling using the same indicators they have used for over 230 years. Sorry no hockey stick but we may get colder if not for our co2 out put They also say that unless the current solar minimum quits and solar cycle 24 starts we could be heading for some real cold weather But those farmer almanac wacko, big oil supporting, flat earthers and any other name you could call them have no credibility do they? Kind a strange the all this money being spent on co2 studies and hardly any on earth and solar cycles. U.S. government almost stopped the old farmers almanac printing during ww2 because their accuracy was so good it gave the enemy an advantage. Well sorry folks the debate is over (when did it ever start?) please check out the source's below its an eye opener spread the word

Let me get this straight. AGW deniers state 150 years of temp trends is not enough compared to the 100's of millions of years of natural occurrences, but you're going to use Monckton's, a politician and business consultant, graph of the last 8 years as evidence of cooling? You make me laugh!!! You can't realistically throw around words like "myth" and "truth" without the science on your side. http://dels.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/climate_change_2008_final.pdf http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/index.html

The article was very interesting and well worth reading. Thank you for sharing it. The article is in keeping with what I have felt all along.

the truth hurts and anyone who expects truth from any politician is in for severe disappointment. I was wondering why all the warmer faithful were in such a state of frenzied panic recently and now i know!

I looked very carefully at the first graph labeled as the authoritative SPPI composite index of global mean surface anomalies. I thought this was interesting. What is SPPI? Is it affliated with NASA or some other organization with the ability to gather such data? I searched and found that SPPI is the science and public policy institute. Where did they get this data? SPPI is a political organization. They do not have the resources to gather such data. The entire graph is completely made up data. I am guessing the rest of the paper is completely made up too which is not anything new for Lord Monckton.