Activities In Keystone?

Is the Keystone XL Pipeline Project really worth the headache (present and/or future)?

Jon Mixon at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

I like 's answer but I also thought I'd add some scientific perspectives from my reading on the subject. Nature published a really good summary of the climate science-perspective on the tar sands: http://www.nature.com/news/climate-science-a-line-in-the-sands-1.13515. In it, they conclude that the environmental disadvantages from increased carbon dioxide emissions will probably happen anyway because the oil will be shipped by truck otherwise. However, the main point of the article is that Keystone's main legacy will be symbolic. If America chose not to build it then it would signal moving toward a future of cleaner energy rather than being locked in to oil-and-gas infrastructure. Ken Caldeira, a colleague of mine at Stanford and one of the world's leading experts on this, sums it up as such: "“I don't believe that whether the pipeline is built or not will have any detectable climate effect,” he says. “The Obama administration needs to signal whether we are going to move toward zero-emission energy systems or whether we are going to move forward with last century's energy systems.” Of course, this discussion is separate from the threat of oil spills, jobs, etc.

Jeff C. Ho

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.