Find solution
What is your favorite UEFA Champions League ball?

UEFA Champions League Final - Inzaghi Hand Ball?

  • From the replay, it looks like Pirlo's free kick took a deflection off Inzaghi's upper arm into the net. The UEFA site officially had the deflection off Inzaghi's body. ...show more

  • Answer:

    I don't think Inzaghi is responsable for any of the gols,everyone knows he's not the most talented footballer. No ofense to those who think differ.

QSBJNNXEG3FJZV5LRMSYOSESTY at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

definitely a hand ball. all the referees were bias. milan's player did so much fouls yet they didn't get the yellow cards. liverpool was such in a good discipline yet they get 3 or more yellow cards in that match. and the additional time wasn't up yet but they cut it. inzaghi and nesta lied about their sickness. gattuso cheated and got a free kick. overall, liverpool didn't lose fairly. =\

pOweRranGers

liverpool only had the opportunity to score when Milan made a defensive mistake or when the ball hit the ref! liverpools goal was offside and pippos goal was absolutely not handball. if anything he was trying to get out of the way - he didn't know where the ball was going, not did he know where the goalie was. he was advancing to possibly get a rebound goal off the ref. liverpool did not play a better game, and their offense is horrible. they cannot play with the ball on their feet, that is why they only shot from outside the area.

jackolino

he clearly leaned into the ball. he knew what he was doing. and kaka dove before that to get the foul. theyre all a bunch of cheaters. later inzaghi lies on the ground like a little baby as if hes been shot. ynwa

Scotty B

in the source section of my answer is the URL where you can see a still picture of the incident... clearly it was a handball... although probably unintentional, it is the difference between a goal or otherwise. When there's a handball, even if it's unintentional, if it is the only difference between the goal or otherwise, it should have been considered illegal... referees can only ignore unintentional handballs if it doesn't intercept with the gameplay whatsoever...

Luqman H

Definate goal... the ball just hit him, he didn't know what had happened until he saw the ball go in the net!!

Chelsea Shrimper

was above the elbow, and the ball hit him rather than his arm hitting the ball. think its one of the newish interpretations of the rules i guess. as the goal was allowed i suppose it wasnt handball

tom_blaire

i think your right, but they accepted the goal Chelsea is simply the best COME ON CHELSEA

TrueBlue

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.