What is a Retail Incentive Program?

What impact does introducing a dual-sided incentive have on a referral marketing program?

  • I'm looking for a directional sense of what kind of impact to expect when introducing a dual-sided incentive (reward for referrer and referral) on the % of people who refer and the % of people who act on the referral.

  • Answer:

    There’s been some http://www.journals.marketingpower.com/doi/abs/10.1509/jmkg.71.1.84 done a couple of years ago by the good people from the University of Pittsburgh and Korea University on this issue. They examined the how different referral reward schemes affected referral likelihood. Some Background to Start with The study examined the effect of brand strength on 2 common types of reward schemes, a “Reward Me” scheme in which the recommender (the existing customer) receives the reward, and a “Reward Both” scheme in which both parties (the existing customer and the new customer) are rewarded. Two levels of brand strength were pitted against each other; stronger brands versus weaker brands. Stronger brands are brands that are well-established and have high brand awareness. Consumers of stronger brands feel more brand commitment to the brand than consumers of weaker brands. 298 mobile phone subscribers using different mobile services in Korea were examined. There are 3 major mobile services in Korea, the leading brand having 53% market share and the two follower brands having 31.5% and 15.5% share. The leading brand was used as the stronger brand, while the two follower brands were used as weaker brands. The subscribers were told that their mobile phone provider was embarking on a referral reward program. The reward was 60,000 Korean won in free calls (about $50 at the time of the study) in the Reward Me condition or 30,000 won in free calls each in the Reward Both condition. They were then tested for whether they would refer their phone service for the different reward schemes. What They Found The results were condensed into a nice chart shown below. Off the bat, we see that there are some significant differences in referral likelihood between stronger brands and weaker brands for different schemes. For weaker brands: Referral likelihood increased by large margins when rewards were introduced (for both Reward Both and Reward Me schemes). The Reward Me scheme fared slightly better than Reward Both. Researchers explained that consumers of weaker brands care a lot about what they get out of the referral as they tend to be more price sensitive. This perception caused them to be more attracted to the reward scheme where they gained the most, which was the Reward Me scheme. For stronger brands: The Reward Both scheme performed a lot better compared to the Reward Me scheme. Now this is surprising. The consumers of stronger brands did not seem to care about the higher reward they obtained for referrals in the Reward Me scheme! What is going on here? Researchers think this counterintuitive result is due to existing customers having a high affinity for the brand and are already willing to make the referral. By offering a larger reward to referrer, it makes it seem like they are in it for the money.  Additionally, the study showed that consumers of a strong brand tend to be less price sensitive. So the bigger reward in the Reward Me scheme didn’t increase referral likelihood as it was seen as less important. How does this apply to me? This study only looks at referral likelihood, which represents just one dimension of customer referral programs. In reality, there are other dimensions to consider (such as how to ensure that referrals result in a purchase). However, there are still some clear practical takeaways that we can obtain from this. First off, it’s clear from the study that rewarding customers for referrals improves referral likelihood over not rewarding them. Secondly, the strength of a brand affects how customers react to a referral program. So which type of reward scheme should you choose? For newly launched brands: Choose either the Reward Me or Reward Both scheme. If you go with a Reward Both scheme, the study suggests that you should give bigger rewards to your existing customers. They tend to be more price sensitive and doing so might increase referral likelihood significantly. For stronger, established brands: A Reward Both scheme is the clear choice. The study shows that your existing customers tend to be less price sensitive, so this means you should skew rewards to new customers and play down the rewards to your existing customers. You could also check out this quora question for . On a side note, it’s interesting to note that referral does bring in higher quality customers that have an average of 16% higher lifetime value as compared to non-referred customers. Check out http://blog.referralcandy.com/2011/01/10/do-referral-programs-bring-you-better-customers/ on this. Check out http://www.jeffbullas.com/2012/07/24/72-fascinating-social-media-marketing-facts-and-statistics-for-2012/for more statistics on referral/social media marketing. Hope this helps!

Alex Lau at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Nobody want to feel that they are being taken advantage of, when you offer a reward to both parties, everyone see's themselves as a winner. I think the referral programs that are the least effective, are the ones that only reward the referrer and sometimes even give an ongoing residual reward based upon the usage, or purchases of the user that was invited.........it makes the invited feel like they are at the bottom of some pyramid scheme, with the potential of not only a bad taste in their mouth, but also the loss of a customer that actually did lie your service.

Kyle Johnstone

With very few exceptions, a referral program must be "dual-sided" to achieve the results typically expected by the marketing department. Here's what you should expect from rewarding both parties: An easier sell to get existing customers referring. Without a call-to-action involving a reward, a customer just goes about their day. Don't bother talking about % change: this is completely necessary to create a meaningful amount of activity within the program. A reason for the referee (the referred prospect) to participate. Some will have converted without an incentive -- but an incentive will bring in a larger number of leads and convert a greater % into new customers. This also ensures the referee takes any action necessary to "close the loop", and identify themselves as being referred. Overall, referrals from your greatest advocates are going to happen to some degree without any rewards involved. Creating a value proposition for both parties allows you to take a step further in motivating a larger client base to refer, and a greater volume of prospects to consider the product.

Sean Peterson

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.