Why so many Killzone 2 haters?

i like t. it feels way more realistic

You can adjust sensivity to turn faster and move better. The controls are NOT sluggish, the ones in the demo were. But that was because it was a 2 year old demo. All the Killzone haters are Xbots that are just jealous.

I would like you to go check out or rent Haze. This was supposedly the best looking game and the game to revolutionize gaming. Play it. If you didn't chuck your PS3 out the window, you must have noticed it S-U-C-K-E-D. This had SOOOOOOOOOO much hype. It couldn't live up to it. Nothing could and Killzone 2 won't be able too. I will be good. Just not as good as people expect.

PEOPLE LAZY TO CHANGE THE CONTROLS I think the game is very realistic online has no lag no games end cod4 had lag games ending

killzone is a bit more realistic than COD. I find it a lot harder, but more enjoyable. usually people who hate the game arent good enough to really sit down and get good at it, so they play easier games to satisfy themselves. but i do agree the players feel heavy, but that is realistic with all their armor on. you can change the controls to a COD feel, with almost the exact same buttons and you can change the sensitivity of the controlers axis's so its easier to move side to side when aiming and such, so that would help most of those haters out there

What, is it love it or hate it now? I haven't seen anyone calling Killzone crap. If you're not impressed by it and won't jump on the bandwagon, that doesn't make you a hater, only someone with common sense. Who doesn't just run with the crowd. Killzone 2 is a fine shooter with really pretty graphics. I wouldn't say it was so good that everyone had to get it though. It plays about the same as most shooters but a little unresponsive on the control end and some badly thought-out elements. Like the grenades with tracers, and having to get the square to appear before you can pick up a weapon. A few other things. And besides, I haven't heard of, or seen in the demo, anything really original about it, like there is about MAG which will probably be the next shooter I get. Killzone beats the other shooters of its type, but not by enough to justify paying 3 times as much. It's maybe 50% better than the average shooter, and 20% better than Resistance. But the average shooter sits in the game store used for $15, and Killzone2 costs $60. And Warhawk is now $20 and still beats all the shooters as far as my money is concerned. If Killzone's slowness is due to realism, then why do the grenades produce tracers, and what about the magic electric bullet-removal device? It's pretty far from realistic. Fun, but not worth $60 for me.

The ones in CoD were like the RPG-7 which is about fifteen pounds. They slow down when they pull them out so that adds to the realism, it depends on the design.

I thought it was alright.=]