Are the mobile signatures used in Square, PayPal and Flint payment apps legally binding?
-
Example: http://Flint.com allows you to sign a credit card payment on your smartphone/tablet. You use your forefinger like a pen writing your signature right on the touchscreen. The so created handwritten signature looks very much like a physical signature on paper. Is this legally binding? Is this self-developed or does anybody know the actual creator of this app?
-
Answer:
In all 50 states and territories of the US "Electronic Signatures" are viewed as enforceable and binding to all parties to the agreement(s). The electronic facsimile of a cardholder's signature is not just an artifact of Flint, but also of Square, PayPal and other mobile payment companies. You will also witness signature pads at all large retailers in the US. The First Electronic Signature Was Morse Code The case law reaches back to the 1850s in the US where Morse Code was transmitted via Telegraphy [1]. Saturday, June 10th, 1871, Samuel F. B. Morse sending his last telegraph message, his signature: "S ... F .-. B -... M -- O . . R . .. S ... E ." to a standing ovation. 1869 And The First Legal Test Of An Electronic Signature In 1869 the New Hampshire Supreme Court decided a case that challenged if a telegraphed contract was valid. In the findings: "It makes no difference whether that operator writes the offer or the acceptance, with a steel pen an inch long attached to an ordinary penholder, or whether his pen be a copper wire a thousand miles long. In either case the thought is communicated to the paper by the use of the finger resting upon the pen; nor does it make any difference that in one case common record ink is used, while in the other case a more subtle fluid, known as electricity, performs the same office." This ruling has formed the foundation in US law all the way up to the Facsimile machine and the current finger signatures that are common to the current smartphone payment apps. The US codified the law more clearly in the E-Sign Act ( the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act} from 2001 [2]. This expands upon the prior Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) [3]. The E-Sign Act states: (a) IN GENERAL.âNotwithstanding any statute, regulation, or other rule of law (other than this title and title II), with respect to any transaction in or affecting interstate or foreign commerceâ (1) a signature, contract, or other record relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforce- ability solely because it is in electronic form; and (2) a contract relating to such transaction may not be denied legal effect, validity, or enforceability solely because an electronic signature or electronic record was used in its formation. A Payment Card Transaction Is A Signed Contract A Payment Card transaction is a contract between the cardholder and the card issuing bank and indirectly the merchant. When a cardholder authorizes a bank for the use of a Payment Card they are also authorizing your approval of all transactions with or without a signature. Thus at the very least there is cardholder authorization for a transaction that was conducted using an Electronic Signature regardless of the E-Sign Act. But with the E-Sign Act the mark would be considered valid unless the cardholder contests or otherwise repudiates the transaction. This would be considered a Chargeback and it is another thing entirely (see: ). Apple And A New IOS "Home Button", A Finger Print Electronic Signature System The electronic signature will continue to evolve. In the future other unique identifiers will be used to confirm or authorize a payment card transaction. Look for Apple to release an integrated fingerprint scanner (for a multitude of reasons) in to new IOS devices that can be used as an electronic signature to confirm and authorize payment card transactions (see: ). This feature will form the basis of Apple's new iWallet and extension to Passbook. Image from the 2008 Apple patent 20100082444 showing NFC Logo and fingerprint scanner (using the older AuthenTec thin rectangular finger print scanner AES2750). I believe the actual fingerprint scanner will be the Home Button using another AuthenTec product. A long Journey The electronic signature has come a very long way from the days of Mr. Morse's invention. However the intent continues to perform the same basic human function, I authorize and confirm this contract. ___ 1) http://crawls-wm.us.archive.org/katrina/20051022073309/http://www.cato.org/speeches/sp-ss031799.html#1b 2) http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-106publ229/pdf/PLAW-106publ229.pdf 3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Electronic_Transactions_Act
Brian Roemmele at Quora Visit the source
Other answers
To add to 's incredible answer - modern document management systems allow you to electronically "sign" a document by clicking a button saying you signed it. The system knows who you are, so clicking that button is the same as signing on a sheet of paper. This will apparently hold up in court, so leaving your computer unlocked is the same as leaving your signature laying around.
Matt Wasserman
It is legal per ESIGN act and UETA. However, depending on the type of transaction - particularly if it's for a potentially litigious, you want more than just a picture of a signature (which is what the drawn signature is), but the whole process evidence tied to it. Here's a handy guide from http://www.silanis.com/blog/archives/e-signature-evidence-101/ : To head off potential litigation when using electronic signatures and transactions â especially in regulated processes â it is crucial to capture e-signature evidence related to the signer(s), the document(s) and the entire signing process. But in the event of a legal dispute, defending your case is about more than presenting an authentic signed record of an electronically signed agreement. It is about proving: Consent â The signer consented to the use of electronic signatures; Intent â The signer intended to be bound by the terms of the contract; Tamper-proof â The electronic records have not been altered since being signed; Presentation â How the records were presented to the signer; Compliance â That the signing process complied with all applicable laws and regulations; Access â That the signer had access to reliable copies of the signed document(s) after the fact. - See more at: http://www.silanis.com/blog/archives/e-signature-evidence-101/#sthash.mMrmgrWh.dpuf
Melanie Attia
Related Q & A:
- How to develop a mobile payment system?Best solution by itproportal.com
- Can a Paypal payment be recalled?Best solution by answers.yahoo.com
- Can a prepaid visa be used with paypal?Best solution by paypal.com
- Is there a site that offers payment in Paypal?Best solution by paypal.co.uk
- Does T-Mobile charge a late payment fee?Best solution by answers.yahoo.com
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.