Venice or Rome, Italy? If you had two days to visit in each .. which city would you choose?

ROME!!! I've been to both and they are both truly amazing, but you will never see anything like Rome. Even just sitting outside eating outstanding food and people watching is unlike anything you could imagine!

Depends on what you are up for... Rome is amazing. There are A LOT of things to see, awesome restaurants, and great night life. However... two days is not very much for Rome. You may feel rushed and overwhelmed. Just when you start to figure the city out, you're going to have to leave. Venice is an incredible place too... but much smaller. You can adequately see Venice in two days. There's museums, cathedrals, and plenty of pigeons. Take a ride on a gondola and visit a Murano glass factory. Honestly... due to your short amount of time, Venice might be a better option. Save Rome for when you can spend at least 5 days there. But neither city is a bad decision. You'll love either one!

No doubt.It will be Rome..

Rome, especially since I only got 3 day there anyway..

I pick Rome, because it's a romantic place to be. Do site seeing, shopping. there is nothing much you can do in 2 days in any country. Is it worth it?

i have been to both and if I had only two days and had to opt for one city it would be Rome without doubt .. there is so much to see and to that you will find two days is not enough .. have a safe and enjoyable trip!

Venice, I always wanted to see how they have life living in a city on water.

well if I get two days each why choose? but If i had too probably Venice, I'd dig deep into the culture though not just tour stuff.

I've been to both, and would return to Venice in a heartbeat. Rome definitely has a lot of cultural and historical sites, which are fascinating. It's also large, dense and busy. Venice has the culture and history, but the beauty is overwhelming. Plus, no cars!