Why don't we use Lie-Detector tests on criminals ?
-
Instead of a judge and jury. I understand that lie-detector tests are only right 99.999...% of the time but surely they can assist a verdict. And people can be bribed and swayed. If ...show more
-
Answer:
Because its not 99.999% accurate. even in an argument from the biggest promoters of the polygraph, the example given is of of 87.5% accuracy, and 20% "inconclusive" results. That might sound good until you realize that of a 100 people tested in a murder case, about 10 innocent people would be found to be "lying," and 20 with "inconclusive" results. The latter might include both innocent people and murderers. Looked at another way, of a 100 murderers, 10 would be found to be telling the truth, and 20 would have inconclusive results. Out of 100 murders, 30 would not be identified, according to the accuracy assumed in the example.
NBAOVC2IZMPEM4K52G4IRGAL6I at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
theyre inaccurate...and people can BEAT them
KERMUGE
Your figurs are way off.....lie detectors are not extremely accurate...as a matter of fact they fail to catch people in lies at a fairly high rate....so you are willing to let a criminal go because he is able to beat the test?
ohiofirefighter42
Most of the American Federal agencies admit that they can be beaten by someone who knows what they're doing, is a pathological liar or is just irrational. So basically they're not really much good, unless you believe everything you hear on daytime TV.
Pat
No, they are hardly ever right! The Polygraph is essentially pseudo-science, and quite rightly is not accepted in courts. All it does is measure some physical reactions, the results are down to the interpretation of the operator, and that makes it highly subjective, not a forensic tool at all. It is also very easy to fool, as has been demonstrated by many people, for example James Randi
Avondrow
Because they don't necessarily work! This is real stuff we are talking about, not the bloody Jeremy Kyle show! You can't potentially convict or acquit someone based on a toy which doesn't necessarily work properly.
Ryan
Because Jeremy Kyle isn't the Chief of Police.
AngeG
Polygraphs (lie detectors) are not very accurate at all. They are not allowed in court precisely because they cannot be proven to show when someone is telling the truth or not. Anyone who takes one just to satisfy the police is an idiot.
remowlms
Because hopefully, we will never be ready for trial by machine. Lie detector results, just like confessions, can be produced and faked; so they are not admissible as valid evidence and quite right too!
Bart S
They are highly inaccurate and you can train yourself to beat them very easily. Just because they use them on Trisha doesn't mean they work.
Marc S
Related Q & A:
- Why don't I get the little envelope in my taskbar in Outlook Express when I get a message?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Why don't people care about the earth?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Why don't I have an information bar?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Why don't we use E-Prime more?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Can my employer use lie detector or not? what about the law?Best solution by nolo.com
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.