Why was Physical Education incorporated into school curriculum?

Why Indian History after 1947 is not part of the curriculum of school education in India?

  • In our history books at school, Indian history after 1947 was not elaborated too much. Just the Global policies made by Nehru and stuff alike. It'd be great to enlighten the students about events like Indo-china war in 1962, Indo-Pak War, Emergency in 1978, Pokhran Nuclear Test in 1998, etc.,

  • Answer:

    In order to not revea...You must be signed in to read this answer.Connected to GoogleConnected to FacebookBy continuing you indicate that you have read and agree to the .  Loading account...Complete Your ProfileFull NameChecking...EmailChecking...PasswordChecking...By creating an account you indicate that you have read and agree to the .

Anonymous at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Yes, Now I understand these are to be taught to the students because other wise they would end up making mistakes like you did (India fought china in 1962)

Satish Subrahmanyam

Because the Board of Education doesn't want followers of political parties pelting stones at their office.

Dinesh Raghavendra

Recently I read this book 'India After Gandhi' by R.Guha and I came across this statement - In the Indian academy the past is defined as a single, immovable date: 15 August 1947. Thus, when the clock struck midnight and India became independent, history ended, and political science and sociology began. There are various reasons for this question - People don't consider the era after 1947 as history rather all that has happened during the last 55 years may filter through them easily civics syllabus, popular cinema and television; history as formally constituted knowledge of the past does not cover it. By  training and temperament, historians have restricted themselves to the period before Independence. A vast literature grew – and is still growing – on the social, cultural, political and economic consequences of British colonialism. A even more vast literature grew – and it too is still growing – on the forms, functions, causes and consequences of the opposition to colonial rule. HISTORIANS HAVE GIVEN MORE ATTENTION THAN WHAT IS REQUIRED TO PRE 1947 ERA. History before 1947 had social reformer, spiritualist, prophet and political agitator Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi.That great institution, the British Raj, and that great individual, Mahatma Gandhi, continue to be of absorbing interest to historians. But the history of independent India has remained a field mostly untilled. If history is ‘formally constituted knowledge of the past’, then for the period since 1947 this knowledge practically does not exist The Republic of India is a union of twenty-eight states, some larger than France. Yet not even the bigger or more important of these states have had their histories written. In the 1950s and 60s India pioneered a new approach to foreign policy, and to economic policy and planning as well.There were many controversies whose proper explaination is still not known.Authoritative or even adequate accounts of these experiments remain to be written.

Utkarsh Singh

The Education department founded and headed by Maulana Azad , founding the University of Delhi also hailed to be the Research Institute of India..Maulana Azad was a cleric Muslim born in Mecca , to cleric Muslims , came to India in 1890..He was a frontline supporter to Muslims before Partition and Himself undertook the responsibility of providing food , shelter , money etc to Muslims immigrated to India after Partition..he went to the limit of proposing to give Muslim homes vacated by Muslims during Partition to Muslims only and wanted THE FIRST DELHI POLICE COMMISSIONER , A SIKH , to be sacked !!! Maulana and Nehru had adopted A SOCIALIST India policy way in 1930's..Which Indira Gandhi documented as 42nd ammendment , introducing SECULAR and SOCIALIST words in the Indian constitution of India..Nehru and Maulana had appointed Scholars from Marxist group to write down Indian History and and Academic books , knowing that they were Atheists and would never write anything about Greatness if Hinduism..Pls note that KARL MARX himself hated Hinduism..Already divided , Nehru and his peers made sure that they gave laws (removing clause of Cow slaughter and uniform civil code from main draft by Ambedkar) to india which further divided the society..To make sure they gave prominent status to Ambedkar's Dalit community , The buddhists , who were Hindus before , a seperate identity ..Pls also note that the HONORABLE INDIA TRICOLOR , Has CAKRAWARTI chakra of BUDDHISM indicating 24 rules of Buddhism , The HONORABLE INDIAN EMBLEM , The ASHOKA CHAKRA also a buddhist SYMBOL BY KING ASHOKA ..Hindus got further divided into Buddhists and Hindus..Future ammendments in ARTICLE 30 . 31 A made sure that Hindus cannot operate Hindu religious Schools and cannot raise money for the same while the Minorities can do that..Russia was heavily financing the Gandhi Government and the CPIM in India..(See the Mitrokin Archives)..Marxists did the job from Nehru family of segmenting India..Keeping Hindus at bay ..Lal Bahadur Shastri ji was killed again in Russian continent..Gandhi family came back again to power..After Emergency Indira Gandhi govt threw Marxists out of favour..Kripalu Maharaj and 300 others were killed by police on orders by Indira gandhi to stop cow slaughter ban..It has been a strong conspiracy in India , against its people against the HINDUS...

Kapil B Khanna

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.