Describe the Theory of the Origin of Life?

Which origin of life theory currently holds most sway in academic circles and why?

  • assuming the radiocative beach theory of the origin of life is true, or the theory that life appears when certain conditions are met, then why is life not spontaneously appearing on ...show more

  • Answer:

    I don't think there's any clear consensus. In one lecture I attended, there was a pretty heated debate (over some rather trivial matters, in my opinion). However, my favourite: http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/why-are-cells-powered-by-proton-gradients-14373960 -alkaline vents, which are a porous medium, act like batteries (they form gradients, which can generate work potential) -because these are porous, they act as cells -being alkaline, the conditions would be quite similar to our mitochondria This addresses several big problems with the widespread "primordial soup" theory include the lack of cells - which means there is no means of evolution by selection; and unfavourable energy levels. The one cell organism part isn't that big of an issue in many scientists eyes (though that doesn't mean people will work themselves into a big argument over it). In fact, just this past week, a lab made the claim that single celled yeast evolved into multicellular yeast - though the results are debatable. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/23/yeast-can-evolve-into-multicellular-organisms-in-a-few-short-months/

NU5E5ZWRDYXB5TMUFJKQYOIO4Y at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Two recent books on the origin of life by eminent and longtime researchers in the field have highlighted the challenges in stark and stunning detail. Christian de Duve’s Singularities: Landmarks on the Pathways of Life gives us the biochemical view, and Hubert Yockey’s Information Theory, Evolution, and the Origin of Life gives us the details in terms of Shannon and algorithmic information theory. Both are written for audiences educated to undergraduate-level (in biochemistry and mathematics respectively), so they provide the precision of thought and expression that critics need. Both reject creation/intelligent design quite fiercely, and espouse evolution without question. Hostile witnesses that speak so clearly and forthrightly on this subject are exactly what creationists need to sharpen their own minds and arguments. I highly recommend them both.

CRR

This is a very good question! This is why I don't believe that life could possibly evolve from one cell. I believe that microevolution happens, but I find it impossible that organisms as complex as humans or any mammals could evolve from one cell. The vestigial structures that supposedly indicate shared evolution could just be similar features in different creatures. Age dating for millions of years assumes that the rate of change is fairly constant in the testing methods, and the world does not change in a linear pattern. I'm just as curious how this is 'explained'

Super Turtle Club

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.