What is the difference between Renaissance art and Medieval art?

Medieval art was more around the time of feudalism and more based on comedy and music for kings and nobles. Renaissance art has dramatic plays and actors/actresses were more popular in this time period.

Yaaah, they added some paint by the later period and changed or learnt a bit about perspectives. Made it blossom.

The idea that Renaissance are was more humanistic and less religious is true, though not to the extreme that some would imply. Look at the most famous works by Michelangelo, da Vinci, et al. The Pieta, the Sistine Chapel Ceiling, the Last Judgement, The Last Supper, all of the various Madonna's and Child, The Moses, the various David's, even the mythologically themed paintings by Boccaccio and others...there was a LOT of religious painting and sculpting going on. There was, however much that was not, for example, the Mona Lisa and various other portraitures, Holbein's The Ambassadors, and Eyck's Arnolfini Marriage. Still, the Renaissance was not overwhelmingly humanistic, at least not in the more modern sense of the term. And there was certainly some medieval art that was 'humanistic,' from the Bayeax Tapestry to various works depicting the daily life in towns and life of the serfs working the land.