What is a social culture photographer?

Social Sciences: What is culture? What is society? What's the difference?

  • Does one depend on the other? Does only one or do both depend on the individual mind/brain/whatever is studied by psychology? What is the genealogy of these words' usage?

  • Answer:

    Culture and society are two different perspectives with which one can analyze similar phenomena.  Culture refers to what referred to as "collective sentiments", which is the shared meanings, values and symbols of a community.  Society refers to stable patterns of relationships between people based on enduring roles which are not tied to specific individuals.  That sounds a lot more complicated than it actually is, but if you just think of a kinship structure - its a structure of roles, not people.  That is, if you're a son, you will become a father, a grand father, a great grandfather, etc..  The structure of relationships between father and son is enduring, and we move through them as individuals.  In the early days of anthropology, there was a split between British anthropologists, who tended to focus on society, and American's, who tended to focus on culture.  But these days the general sense is that cultural meanings only arise within social structures, and social structures are held together by cultural values.  So, it might be useful to distinguish between them for analytical reasons, they're not really separable. For example, look at the Chinese martial arts.  Culture would be the meanings which one attributes to certain physical movements (e.g. Chineseness, Daoism, ideals of discipline, etc.), and the physical movements themselves.  And society would be the networks of individuals through which the practice and culture are taught.  Now, you can't have a teacher without ideas of what it is to teach, how to relate to an authority figure, ideals of expertise, etc..  And you can't transmit a teaching outside of the structure of a school, or some other social institution.  So, you can see how social institutions and culture rely on each other. Brains are definitely involved in society and culture - and you see patterns in social organization which are presumably tied to patterns in human cognitive abilities (e.g. as groups get larger, either the social organization gets more complex or gets less efficient).  But it is a mistake to see group activity as purely a function of psychology, or the minds of individual actors.  There are complexities introduced by social organization which aren't reducible to the individual actors involved.

Peter Leykam at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

To simplify it to the point of oversimplification I would regard a society as the laws and protocols that govern a community than live in the same location and culture as their artistic and creative expression. It's possible for example for me to enjoy Japanese culture in the Australian society in which I live. I can eat Japanese food while wearing Japanese clothes, drinking sake and listening to Koto music. I can only be a part of Japanese society in Japan.

David Stewart

I like David Stewart's distinction between the two, but would add that society and culture seem reciprocally bound, symbiotic, in a sense. The manifestation of culture, of art, especially, is often a reaction or response to the restrictions and freedoms represented within society. Accordingly I might characterize society as the environment that makes culture viable and pronounceable. For instance, a technologically advanced society allows for a culture that draws on newer mediums for its expression. But if this is the case, then culture contributes to society by speaking to its flaws, shortcomings, and strengths; any given society might be revealed as particularly oppressive or corrupt or glorious by the disposition of cultural acts. For example, out of the racially oppressive environment of New York in the 1920s came the Harlem Renaissance, a cultural movement that gave a voice to the severely marginalized black community. Over time these new voices gained attention, grew stronger, and addressed the palpable social injustices more directly, ultimately establishing a foundation for the civil rights movement. And so it is a give-and-take relationship between the two. The culture of one society might be integrated with another, but it is not merely a passive transference: it can inspire societal change. The potential for change, however, would require a collective effort, the conglomeration of individual effort.

Anonymous

By graph theory definition. Society is a graph People are nodes Edges represent the culture.

Sandeep Mederametla

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.