Did people read "Jinnah: India-Partition-Independence" by Jaswant Singh and what are your comments and/or ideas about it?
-
Jinnah: India-Partition-Independence is a book written by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaswant_Singh, a former Finance Minister of India and an External Affairs Minister, on Pakistan's founder Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and the politics associated with the partition of British India. It is currently the latest book written by an Indian politician on the life of Jinnah. The book was released on 17 August 2009 and soon became the subject of controversy, subsequently leading to Singh's expulsion from the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP). It contains controversial opinions of Singh, claiming that Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru's centralized policy was responsible for partition, and that Jinnah was portrayed as a demon by India for the partition.
-
Answer:
I did read it and even wrote a review of it somewhere which is lost in the sands of the internet. Since it has been a while, some brief thoughts: First, it's not so much a biography of Jinnah - it's more of a book about Indian independence and partition. Since Jinnah is so central to both, and Jaswant feels Jinnah regularly gets short changed in Indian history the book has Jinnah in it's title, but it's definitely not a biography of Jinnah. It's well worth reading, especially if you've grown up being drip fed the standard Indian view of Jinnah, which from my Indian friends I can sort of summarise into "Meh. Jinnah. Whatever. Gandhi and Nehru are the giants of Indian history". Jaswant Singh makes the point that Jinnah was a tremendously important figure in Indian politics and perhaps more than any other Indian figure contributed to pushing India towards Independence. Jaswant says Jinnah was instrumental in pushing the entire Indian leadership towards Independence - including Gandhi, who is viewed by many today as someone who sprung forth fully formed, homespun clothing and all, and didn't need any urging and guiding in his politics. Jaswant Singh has done his fair share of hate mongering in the past, but in his book he basically says Pakistan is a country, and it was India's to loose and India should take some responsibility for Pakistan rather than always viewing it as this 'other' to be reviled and hated. About Muslims - Jaswant talks about that it wasn't just Jinnah who independently decided to create a Muslim state, there was a lot of collusion and ill will by many others which led Jinnah to demanding a separate state - which almost to the end Jinnah didn't want, rather he was seeking more representation for Muslims in India - and that too only after ill dealing by members of the Indian National Congress, particularly Nehru, lead Jinnah to drop the very idea of Hindu-Muslim unity. Jaswant agrees with Jinnah that Muslims were a oppressed minority in India and further Jaswant goes on to blame many of the Indian leaders for not leading the war forward in equality - for to deal with equality of minorities you also have to to think and deal with the Hindu caste system. I have read some of Nehru's writings, and he is a tremendously intelligent human and though some of Nehru's ramblings in say, his letters to his daughter from prison telling the story (story, not so much history) of the world are laughably incomplete and sometimes wrong the sheer knowledge and firepower Nehru lights up world history with is incredible. Jaswant's opinion of Nehru is that while Nehru was super smart, he was a slimey operator who was vain, egotistic and didn't let little things like the good of all India stand in his way to power. He puts a lot of blame on Nehru for not making any real efforts to work with Jinnah, and instead concentrating on building his own power base. Even Gandhi, who normally is spared in Indian books, gets some scorn for basically stepping out of politics when he could have been instrumental in preventing mass bloodshed during partition, and allowing Nehru to do whatever he wanted. Jaswant points out that Gandhi was such a powerful figure that part of Nehru's power came from Gandhi's blessing - but even when Nehru took steps which Gandhi wasn't ok with - like pushing for a separate state just to get rid of Jinnah so Nehru would finally be all powerful - Gandhi only made a couple of half hearted attempts to restrain his former prodigy and never withdrew his blessings from Nehru. Jaswant was a fan of Jinnah's idea of a weak center with strong states, and blames Nehru for wanting a strong central state and driving Jinnah to the point where he demanded a separate country altogether. This is a key takeaway from the book - that it wasn't Jinnah alone who created Pakistan, it was very much the Indian National Congress as well, assisted by the British who saw Pakistan as a millstone which would hold back India. For if there is one thing the British didn't want, Jaswant says, it was a strong independent India. Last but not least, Jaswant makes the point a few times that Jinnah didn't hate Hindu's. Which seems obvious considering Jinnah was the leader for Hindu-Muslim unity for many years, but that part has been forgotten by many in the BJP. There's lots more. It's an interesting book through out, though Jaswant is no writer and it's a hard slog to finish.
Khalid Omar at Quora Visit the source
Other answers
Majority of our Fore-fathers were of the view & told that there was no rift among common Hindu and muslim community in undivided India and they were living in harmony. There was no or little influence of political parties like Congress or ML and mostly common indians were influenced by charisma of Mahatma Gandhi and he was considered as the undisputed 'uncrowned king' of British India by the Britsh for the India . Mr.Gandhi,, Mr.Jinnah and father of Mr.Nehru, Motilal Nehru were all the leading practising lawyers in England and were great buddies.Jinnah had more stakes, valuable properties and other interests in Bombay and New Delhi than in Karachi.(Queston is why he would go for division leaving out his valuable properties and other stakes?)) The British decided to leave India only after their defeat in WW-2 and were desprate to leave India due to its shattered economical conditions aftermath WW2 and were unable to rule vast India anymore as people were becoming more poorer in over-populated India. Mahatama Gandhi was the only shrewd,farsighted statesman and leading "Thinktank"of that time and viewing the general condition of world financial and other conditions falling after WW2, he might had decided to go for division ' for time being', till further the 'improvement of world situation'. Had Mr Gandhi be alive for some more years, he had capacity ,will and stamina with sincerity to reunite both indo-pak as Gandhi had more influence in both partitioned states than any leader of that time and only after early death of both Gandhi and Jinna shortly after partition, the things of both countries gone out of control in the hands of unmature leadership of both countries : personal views as known from near and dear late forefather
Oshex Ashok
Related Q & A:
- What are your creative Easter Basket ideas?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What are some funny birthday card ideas?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Hey people read this?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What are actually scary Halloween party ideas?Best solution by wikihow.com
- What are some good face painting ideas?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.