Am I making the right decision? (Plus bonus negotiation questions)
-
I am an academic in Australia, in a social sciences/humanities field that I have mentioned before but would rather not repeat here for googleability reasons. I am currently employed until the middle of this year. I have a job offer in another city that I think I'm going to accept. I'm worried it might be the wrong decision. Background I am at a university ranked among the top 10 in the world in my discipline. My husband is a scientist also at this university, who has managed to cobble together contracts here of between six months and three years continually since 2004, is currently unemployed (since November) but expects to be able to put together more short-term contracts in the future if he hangs around. Australia doesn't really have a tenure system (any more). The best you can get is a "continuing contract", which means your contract has no fixed end date. Usually a new appointment to a continuing funding line would be fixed term for three years or so, with a performance review followed by a confirmation of continuing status. The offer The offer I just got is at a university elsewhere. It is for a fixed term contract of five years, with the "possibility" that it would be converted to continuing at the end of that time, subject to performance and available funding. It seems like a great department, an exciting role, with just the right mix of teaching and research. They are offering me nearly twice what I currently earn, at an academic level much higher than my current appointment (high enough that I could apply for promotion to Associate Professor within three or four years.) They are also willing to offer me a generous start-up package of research funding. The cons There is nothing at that university for my husband. They don't even have a department for his discipline. There are, however, six or so universities in that city, of which at least two do have small groups of people working on things that are at least tangentially related to his research. I doubt they'll be able to offer him paid work, at least at first, but maybe eventually. And they'd probably be willing to offer him visiting fellow status, so he can use an office and a computer. We are not willing to live apart or do a weekly commute between here and there, especially since he doesn't actually have a job here either. The university is ranked low, low down the rankings. Like, 600th or so in the world. However, they are really keen to increase their research profile, so are pumping money into research, and the specific people in my discipline there are good. (They pretty much all got poached from my current institution!). I don't care about rankings purely in terms of prestige, but I care if it will make me unemployable later, especially since this position isn't guaranteed to become continuing. Also if it makes it impossible for me to attract good PhD students or to get external grants. We would have to move cities. We bought a house here a few years back. It's not a huge deal to move: I know people do it all the time. But it does mean that all else being equal (which it's not), we'd prefer to stay here. The new city is one I would like to live in, but the university is in a part of the city which is not so nice, and traffic/commuting etc in this new city is pretty horrible. The alternative I applied for a postdoc at my current institution back in October. In November I was interviewed, along with a few other people. Their first choice turned them down. They told me I was the best of the rest of the candidates, but that they wanted to readvertise to try to get a wider pool to choose from. They told me to reapply, in case they "can't get anyone better". I reapplied and they are holding new interviews late next week. The selection committee confirms I am still definitely in the running. They only have five applicants total who are at all viable, and they won't be interviewing them all. Some of the committee thinks I am the strongest applicant. But the chair of the committee gets the final say, as it's his research funding. I asked him if he could hold the interviews any sooner due to my job offer from Other University, and he said no. So I take that (and the fact that he wouldn't hire me back in November) as evidence that he is, at the least, unexcited about my application. If I got it, this job would be a lower academic level, at about half the salary of the other job, a four or five year fixed term with no possibility of continuing afterwards, and working for someone who is unenthusiastic about employing me. The actual work would be fun, and actually very similar to what I'd do at the other university. And it would be continuing at this highly ranked university where my husband has a better chance of getting future employment. My questions So what to do? Should I even wait and attend the interview next week and then wait to find out whether I am successful, given that this means delaying my acceptance of the other job by longer than they would prefer? (They initially asked me to make a decision by early next week, but I might be able to persuade them to wait.) I'm tending towards thinking that the other job is so much better in so many ways that I should just accept it and withdraw my application for the postdoc here. This is what my husband says he thinks I should do too. Secondly, am I really screwing up my husband's career here? He is willing to make the sacrifice for me, but it is a big sacrifice I am asking. It's kind of his turn (I came to Australia for him), but I don't want to ruin his life. And finally, I haven't mentioned this other job possibility to the university I have an offer from, because (a) I don't actually have a competing offer, just an interview, and (b) it is a worse job on paper in every way, so it doesn't seem like great negotiation fodder. Is this a mistake? I am currently still negotiating the details of salary with the other university. If I mention the postdoc, and they ask about the salary, I'd have to admit it's ridiculously low, which would seem to work against me. But I know that being (perhaps) about to have a competing offer is traditionally something someone brings up in negotiation.
-
Answer:
It looks like the choice is between one viable academic career plus one screwed up academic career or two not very viable academic careers. I think the first is better overall but it is asking something of your husband.
lollusc at Ask.Metafilter.Com Visit the source
Other answers
It seems to me that neither you nor your husband have a viable future at your existing institution. Your husband has never been offered a continuing contract. And from what you've said, it's clear that your department are not taking your application for the postdoc seriously. "You're top of the list, but we want to re-advertise to make sure the process is transparent" is passive-aggressive academic speak for "we are currently assembling the usual shortlist of personal friends of the HOD, former PhD students of personal friends at other institutions, and flashy Oxbridge types with impressive degrees but no actual research programme whom we will inevitably consider for this position over you." For all intents and purposes, the postdoc "opportunity" doesn't exist as a viable option for you. They've already made their position clear by saying no to you in the first round. General rule of thumb in academia: if you ever get mixed messages like this about a new internal position or a contract extension ("oh, everyone in the department thinks you're great, and we're all on your side, but let's just see what the final application pool looks like, shall we?"), RUN. You have a golden opportunity in one of the world's best cities (a five-year contract with the possibility of permanency is gold in this academic economy), and if Ashlyth is right that this is UWS we're talking about, it has a rapidly rising research profile and you will not suffer professionally by association with it.
Sonny Jim
I think the cost of living in New City is rather higher than Old City (if I'm reading you correctly) so the higher salary won't necessarily go as far one might expect. That aside, your position at Old University sounds precarious. The committee chair is unenthusiastic about you, so your long-term future isn't really secure there. And your husband has been trying to find a permanent place at Old University for some years, so he's probably exhausted all current possibilities; New University will at least offer the chance of finding something more stable. I'd go with New University and its New Opportunities. Best of luck, whatever you do.
Joe in Australia
The postdoc isn't viable. You were their top choice, and they reran the search for someone else. They know you have an actual real offer, and they have no intention of speeding up the search. You have the chance at a high paying job for 5 years. And a school that is really into increasing its research profile is actually quite capable of making a visible difference in that time.
jeather
The alternative doesn't sound like a viable option. That's kind of offensive that they were like, "You're OK but we want to see if we can find someone better." I absolutely wouldn't count on it and I wouldn't mention it, personally. This is obviously a big decision and it sounds like you've discussed it with your husband, which would be my first advice. I think you need to think about how happy you are at your current university and how long you reasonably hope to stay there, or how long you hope to stay at your current job. Also, do you sense your current gig could be up soon? If you want your next job to be something that lasts a few years and not forever, it's less risky. But are you looking to start a family and settle down at some point? If you absolutely love your current job, I'd say don't go -- money is never worth leaving a situation where you are really happy, since you never know what a new job/city will feel like -- but since you're interviewing around, seems like you're keen to start a next chapter. Double the money is compelling, but is that enough to cover your husband's salary he won't be making anymore? I realize this offer is from a lower-ranked university, but if they are poaching good people and investing a lot of money, you may come away with some good talking points. "Increased x by x," "initiated new x" etc. It sounds like there is room for you to gather some accomplishments for yourself. Do you think you'll be able to play a role in expanding and introducing some big new stuff for the university? And if it's a new team, you may be able to help shape things and take a leadership role -- do you think you'll be able to take on more responsibility and ownership for the research than you can now? Sometimes being a big fish in a small pond isn't so bad (although it sounds more like it's just an empty pond and they are bringing in some big fish!). People often start threads asking about moving to certain cities. I have moved many times in my life and honestly, cities always take me by surprise. Cities I was excited to move to because I thought they'd be great were the ones I hated. Cities that seemed dumpy on one end of the spectrum or overwhelming on the other end were awesome. Cities I thought were fun to visit, I hated living in and vice versa. And even though I loved some cities and hated others, when I really think about how happy I was, nothing affected my happiness in each city more than how much I liked my job/co-workers and my social life. The city is a bit secondary and it's something you can't predict anyway. Focus on the job, your career and your gut feeling... Gut feeling is big. Make sure you visit the new job, meet the people, see the facilities, etc. See how it feels.
AppleTurnover
Take the new job and try to grow their prestige with your contribution. This will NOT hurt your resume but in fact improve it. "Worked at top ten university for x years. Moved to 600th university and in x years based on projects xyz grew rankings to top 200 worldwide" If the latter doesn't happen that's the university's fault. If it DOES.... Hell that was all you. Take the new opportunity. The salary bump alone will place you further afield for future jobs and negotiations.
chasles
I say do it. You're getting double the pay and an offer that ensures at least five years of stability (with the possibility of more), and you get out of the postdoc cycle. Without knowing too specifically what your husband does, for twice your current wage he can probably can make do for another few months of spinning his wheels before he finds another way to fit in with the local science scene, figures out a way to collaborate long-distance, or just gets into another field entirely. If you're serious about wanting into academia, and your career is going well while your husband's is (relatively) stalled, I reckon it's time he puts his aside and helps you get into the next part of your career.
barnacles
I'm not in academia, but I've known a lot of researchers. Almost all have had to travel for work, and all academic couples have had to make hard decisions in order to live near each other. Your husband will be making a sacrifice to move to New City, though given that he's only had short term contracts for 10 years, I can't see that it'll be a huge career sacrifice. Funding in science isn't looking like it'll improve anytime soon. Don't do a post doc with someone that doesn't want you!
kjs4
If the city is the one I'm thinking it is, isn't it a possibility there might turn out to be *more* employment opportunities there for your husband than your current location, not less?
dontjumplarry
If you want a viable academic career, I think you need to take the offered position and your husband needs to suck it up and make the best of it as a trailing spouse. Honestly, it's about that simple and binary, because modern academic life almost always means first giving up control over where you live and being willing to deal with the uncertainty of that, and second finding your own imperfect solution to the two body problem. I wouldn't use the post doc as a negotiation tool, since it's obviously so much worse than the offered position (on status as well as salary) -- negotiate the new position on its own merits. The current place is clearly not all that excited about you staying, so a chance to leave is a good thing and should be embraced. Even if you got the post doc renewed, with only two offers in four years that is a fairly high-risk option. World-wide rankings usually aren't as important as national or regional rankings, but something to remember is that there are a lot more low-ranked schools than top-ten places, and they all need faculty. If that becomes your niche, embrace it and get good at it, rather than always thinking about how you would rather be at Harvard (or its Australian equivalent). We all know that person, and it's not dignified. Five years with a chance of continuation is only one year less security than a US tenure track position, for what that's worth (and even then you are usually on a two or three year contract during the pre-tenure time, and those get cancelled with some regularity -- people exaggerate the job security). That's long enough to develop your research, see if the new place is a good fit, and to relax a little. It's also long enough for your husband to use the support of your higher salary to look for work in his field or, if that fails, to look at his other options. And of course, congratulations on the offer!
Dip Flash
Related Q & A:
- How do I choose the right digital camcorder?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- How do I import folders from Yahoo Mail to Outlook? I already have Yahoo Mail Plus?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- How bad is the I-95 thing right now?Best solution by answers.yahoo.com
- How do I find the right guy?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Why can't I pop my Yahoo email I do not have mail plus?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.