Find solution
How can I share with contacts my video from youtube?

What's with the special 'Share this video' link on YouTube?

  • Why does each YouTube video have a special 'Share this video' link, at the http://youtu.be/ domain? Is there a meaningful difference between using the link provided and just copying the URL from the address bar? For example, the URL (in the address bar) for CSNY's 'Teach Your Children' is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx4AATLY7L8. The 'Share this video' link is http://youtu.be/wx4AATLY7L8. It's not substantially shorter, so that can't be the reason. I thought perhaps there was metadata embedded in the 'Share' link, but the unique video identifier is identical in both cases. I find the 'Share' link to be useful when I want to link to a particular point within a video. But why the different URL at a different domain?

  • Answer:

    Internet Marketer here. Although Facebook, Google+, etc have much longer character counts than Twitter, generally you still want a nice clean update if you are sharing something for marketing purposes. In addition, the shorter one just looks SOOO much better. I mean, it's way more appealing to the eye, and it doesn't have the weird special characters like = or ? in them. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx4AATLY7L8 http://youtu.be/wx4AATLY7L8 The shorter link looks so much cleaner, simpler, etc. So, for any sort of sharing where the link may be visible, it just looks cleaner. In addition, the shorter link may encourage users to use that link instead of a third party link shortener (like a bit.ly) which in a sense lets you know it's a Youtube link. bit.ly/NumbersLetters - Who knows what that is? Is it an article? Is it porn? Is it spam? Is it your blog? Who knows. youtu.be/NumbersLetters - Oh! It's a YouTube video.

paleyellowwithorange at Ask.Metafilter.Com Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

It's not substantially shorter, so that can't be the reason. Actually in the world of Twitter where each character counts, being shorter by 15 characters is sort of a big deal. I really think that's all there is to it. Even the domain is shorter. This also keeps people from using other URL shorteners which i think means they can get better referrer stats (meaning that they can get information on where people clicked from to get to that link)

jessamyn

The shortened version is 35% shorter, and saves you 15 characters which is more than 10% of the room available in a tweet. It's substantial.

primethyme

Adding on to what Crystalinne said, a lot of badly written parsing scripts break when they see things such as ?, = and other 'fancy' characters in a URL (Apparently they think it is the 90s still). Anyway, that makes things cleaner and nicer when your entire link highlights and you don't have to copy and past the URL yourself. Example: MUSHclient's URL parser.

Canageek

Hm, fair enough. Clearly I do not live in the world of Twitter.

paleyellowwithorange

On the other hand, for several years now, all URLs have been effectively the same length in twitter, since they started https://dev.twitter.com/discussions/2806?__hstc=61763507.31ec147caf4a06f5af2c3de37d09e394.1380166162383.1380166162383.1380166162383.1&__hssc=61763507.1.1380166162384. So the difference in length between those two links doesn't matter in a tweet.

moonmilk

Hey! So perhaps there are other reasons?

paleyellowwithorange

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.