Should "Big Data" be capitalised?
-
In paragraphs should the term "Big Data" be capitalised? I seam to be finding contradicting information as it is a name for something but also a common term. Which is correct? When the volume and complexity of this cannot be supported by off-the-shelf IT solutions, custom IT frameworks are needed; this results in the data being classed as Big Data. or When the volume and complexity of this cannot be supported by off-the-shelf IT solutions, custom IT frameworks are needed; this results in the data being classed as big data. Please also explain why - not just which is right!
-
Answer:
Big data being an IT concept, I would use the same rules as for terms like OOP (object oriented programming), which usually isn’t capitalized either. http://www.ibm.com/big-data/us/en/ does not capitalize big data, and neither does http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_data. Interestingly, on the site of one of the big players in big data, http://hadoop.apache.org/, I can find hardly any mention of big data. They do mention large datasets :)
tim.baker at English Language and Usage Visit the source
Other answers
In the case you describe above, you're referring to the size of the data set, not the collective of companies that service it. It is not a proper noun. Do not capitalize. By comparison: when you are creating a collective like Big Oil, Big Data, (describing AT&T, Verizon, Cisco, etc.) you are creating an entity. Most entities are then named. And most names are then proper nouns. Most proper nouns are then capitalized in English. So, capitalize in that case: Big Data. Here is an example from Engadget the respected tech blog: http://www.engadget.com/2014/02/26/monsanto-prescriptive-farming/ Engadget is an especially reliable source because they do not use title capitalization. In other words, they capitalized it on purpose instead of just because it's in a title.
David M
"Big Data" sounds like "Big Oil" or "Big Steel", i.e. like it is the name of some conspiracy or collusion among wealthy capitalists against the public good. It makes it sound like you think Google and the NSA are conspiring together to create custom IT frameworks to revoke the people's right to off-the-shelf IT solutions. I think I would say instead: When the volume and complexity of this cannot be supported by off-the-shelf IT solutions, custom IT frameworks are needed; this results in the data being classed as "big data."
shane
Related Q & A:
- How would you transfer data between your data structures and databases?Best solution by Programmers
- How to Display Big Data On A Google Map?Best solution by gis.stackexchange.com
- How to store data in php and get data from php?Best solution by Stack Overflow
- What are some good "beginner level" data modeling/analytics approaches to kick start a data science/analytics team?Best solution by Quora
- How big does a earthquake have to be before it is called big?Best solution by ChaCha
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.