Who is a bike rider?

What Kind of Bike Is Appropriate For A Newbie-ish Rider?

  • Buying a new bike and have no idea which type is most appropriate for my needs. Do I want a comfort bike or a hybrid? Or do I want a vintage ladies cruiser? Please help me make an educated decision. Three bike options, no idea which is best for my needs. I'm basically a biking newbie - last time I rode a bike was in high school, over ten years ago, and that was mostly tooling around the neighborhood and not much else. I am looking for something that would be ideal for bike trails and such - for excersize and fun. Not looking to commute or anything. Option 1: Hybrid bike. I liked the look of it, and though the tires seemed a bit higher than I felt comfortable with the test ride felt smooth and I liked the weight. A bit wobbly as I rode, which was scary and embarassing, but it got easier and I figure the more I ride the muscle memory will return and that won't be an issue. Option 2: Comfort bike. Heavy as heck, but goddamn did I feel safe and stable on that thing. I felt very comfortable. Also less expensive than the hybrid, which appeals to me because I am not rolling in $$ right now and also I don't want to drop tons of money on a bike when I haven't ridden in a decade and who knows if I will even like it. My concern, though, is that once I get used to riding again and if I like it, I'm going to get bored/sick of the comfort bike's weight right quick. Option 3: Vintage cruiser (1970s?) In mint condition, offered to me by a friend trying to get rid of it. Haven't test ridden it yet but will tomorrow. What kind of tires do cruisers have? Friend wasn't able to describe it well and googling doesn't give me any conclusive info - is this basically a road bike? Or are the tires a bit wider? I kind of would prefer to get a 2nd hand bike at first while I get used to riding again, but maybe that's silly of me. More info if necessary: I'm a female (these are all ladies bikes in question), on the curvier end of the figure spectrum. I'm not athletic, but I run and swim for excersize so I'm in decent shape, and getting fitter slowly but surely. Help me, hive mind. I know nothing and need advice! What is the best investment given these conditions?

  • Answer:

    Cruisers, especially 70s vintage and beyond, often have big fat heavy tires, often attached to big fat heavy wheels on a big fat heavy frame. It'll be fine for very casual flat land riding on road or paved trail. It'll wear you out if you have to go fast or ride places that require you to get out of the saddle often. But if it's for free, and it works, why not? It might give you a good idea of what you like and don't like in a bike.

thereemix at Ask.Metafilter.Com Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Take the free bike unless it is terrible to ride. Then see how much you ride. I tend to buy bikes second hand because you can get them much more cheaply than new because many people buy bikes the same way people join gyms. They go out and buy a fancy bike and then don't ride it. Don't fall into that trap.

sien

At the advice of a serious cycling friend, I bought a cheap bike first. About $100 at Sprawlmart. But I outgrew it pretty fast on a couple of long, leisurely rides, which I take for mostly social purposes about once every couple of months. Fourteen miles or so, usually, and the cheap bike just completely beat me up on those. So I upgraded pretty quickly to a used Townie, which I'm totally in love with. I would agree that you should start with the free one, but don't be afraid to upgrade as soon as you feel the need. The higher quality of my second bike made all the difference in the world to me. I use mine mostly for running errands and short (about an hour) pleasure rides around town.

raisingsand

a 70's cruiser usually has a good amount of room for the seat to move up, it's the short people who often can't fit on them easily. if it's an internally geared three speed, you may need to put oil in the rear hub but that's not super difficult to do and most stuff is googlable, or search bikeforums. if you have any questions when you get it, feel free to memail me, mr pht and i run a bike rehab/used bike business so he's seen many, many vintage cruisers, and no question will be dumb because i literally knew not a thing about bikes a few years ago and have asked so, so many dumb questions.

kpht

You haven't told us whether you live in a flat or hilly place. It makes a difference.

alloneword

I kind of agree with wierdo. Cheap is great and free is even better, but heavy bikes suck, and heavy tyres and wheels are worse. They just suck the fun out of riding. Obviously you don't want to spend too much, and you aren't sure how much you'll use it, but I figure you're more likely to ride more when riding is fun and takes less effort. In a week or two you'll feel just as stable on the hybrid, but you'll be going faster with less effort. Frankly the most important thing for new riders is finding a shop that you like with people you are happy to deal with and ask questions of.

markr

Tested the vintage bike - when she said vintage, she meant it: no handbrakes. You brake by pedaling backwards. This...might be too much for me given my relative inexperience with bikes. So now I'm kinda leaning towards the comfort bike, knowing full well that I might grow out of it rather quickly. Scoured CL for more used bike options, but feeling a bit overwhelmed now. Sigh.

thereemix

I'm going to break with the pack here and say that it can be demoralizing to have a super-heavy bike if you're not always riding on flat ground. IMO, the lighter the better. Also, you want lots of gears if your town is at all hilly. Constantly being in too high a gear is a great way to ruin your knees. You can get a reasonably decent reasonably light chinese hybrid for $400 new. You want something like that, only a couple of years old. The good and bad thing about the cruisers is the very comfortable riding position. Problem is that it's terribly inefficient. There's a reason why people don't ride upright on road bikes. My SO has http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-us/bikes/model/cypress.st.w/9051/48945/, but with only 6 gears, and it would probably be fine if it didn't weigh 50 pounds or whatever it is that it weighs, but since it does, the gearing isn't nearly low enough. Looks great, though. Most of Tulsa isn't that hilly, but it's still not a great bike for this terrain. To use a personal example, my SO and I bought our bikes at the same time and within a month I was riding a hundred miles a week because it was fun. Only the steepest hills were any real trouble for me. She, on the other hand, rode hers once a week at best because even the mild hills on the trails near where we lived at the time were very uncomfortable with a heavy bike lacking gears.

wierdo

And here, if you're looking for what a typical 70's women's cruiser looks like, here's some we sold: http://www.flickr.com/photos/phatmike/6332388161/in/set-72157627973554587 http://www.flickr.com/photos/phatmike/6332388149/in/set-72157627973554587/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/phatmike/5912360827/in/set-72157627973554587/ All these guys are heavy, but fun to ride unless you're going up a steep hill. And the ten-speed was good for having an easier uphill gear.

kpht

ON rereading, you're not looking to commute. Go for a simple, second-hand mountain bike then. If a cruiser is what I think it is, you won't have any fun at all when the trail goes uphill.

alloneword

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.