What shows up in background checks?

What are the arguments against background checks at gun shows and internet purchases. Is the NRA too powerful?

  • After the Newtown disaster, our reluctance to change the gun laws make us look like the wild west. Has the NRA succeeded in scaring legitimate gun owners that this would be the first step in "taking away your guns?" Are the gun manufacterus more interested in sales than safety? WDYT?

  • Answer:

    I'm sure the main one is that the procedure of doing background checks results in a list of people who own guns for the government.

MaryAnn at Amazon Askville Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

The majority of Americans favor universal background checks as does Congress. A gun manufacturer in Connecticut recently announced no more high round magazine production by his company. My thoughts are there will be some positive steps passed in spite of the gun lobby/NRA.

dougiedognabit

The argument against universal background checks is being promoted by the NRA, the spokesperson and lobbying arm for gun and ammo manufacturers. It is that any controls at all - even the most rudimentary and common sense such as a background check - limits their market, plain and simple. They have no problem with criminals and the mentally ill buying guns. A sale is a sale.

@Goldie

what's the use of background checks SOME of the time? Criminals who want guns, youth who want guns, nuts who want guns, can just go to gun shows and get what they want without any checks. It's ridiculous.

tuppence

Truly ridiculous is our President whining about this or that background check when there are zillions of guns on the street, bought and sold by people who don't care about all those piddly laws our Congress (who's Congress would that be?) writes. He's laboring overtime to make guns more difficult to obtain while two studies have shown the death of his ignorance: background checks have no effect on crime but concealed carry laws DO. What President Obama should be working on is mental health treatment and lock-up for the mentally ill in the U.S. as THAT was the real cause of the tragedy: mentally ill guy with access to weapons. Criminy, Dylan Klebold had extra clips on him!

danielpauldavis

doesn't the Constitution at least imply that citizens having guns are for the purpose of a well-regulated militia?

tuppence

Yes, the wild west is litigious--forgot that.

MaryAnn

He'd probably feel he had the right to have the disturbed person's family make him independently wealthy.

TheLightWorks

The spokesman for the NRA, who we've seen on TV ever since Newtown, gets paid millions of dollars to bleat his propaganda. Wonder how he would feel if it were his grandchild butchered by several rounds by a mentally disturbed person?

MaryAnn

remember, the NRA reading of the second amendment goes as follows: "LALALALALALALALALALA the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" their position is that ANYTHING that gets in the way of a person being able to conveniently buy a gun is more evil than accidentally selling a gun to a person who has lost that right.

TheLightWorks

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.