what is transverse intersection of Whitney stratifications?

intersection of Whitney stratifications

  • Let $X$ be an oriented smooth manifold with dimension $n$. If $U$ and $V$ are two oriented closed submanifolds of $X$ and $U$ is transverse to $V$ in $X$. Then $U\cap V$ (suppose the intersection is not empty) is a submanifold of $X$ with dimension $\dim U+\dim V-n$. Now if $X$ is a Whitney stratification and $U,V$ are Whitney substratifications, i.e. $U$, $V$ are subsets of $X$ with Whitney stratification structure, and each stratum of $U$ and $V$ contained in a single stratum of $X$. Assume that $U$ is transverse to $V$ in $X$, i.e. we require the usual transversal conditions on each stratum, then is it true that $U\cap V$ is a Whitney substratification of $X$ with dimension $\dim U + \dim V - n$? Where can I find some reference on this topic?

  • Answer:

    I wanted to just put a comment but mathoverflow did not allow me.. hope it will soon. The answer is yes and in fact there are better results. Check this article: P. Orro and D. Trotman, 'Regularity of the transverse intersection of two regular stratifications', London Mathematical society, Lecture Note Series 380, Cambridge University Press (2010), p. 298-304.

yangyang at Mathoverflow Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

The Answer is yes. For details see Chap. I, $\S 1$ of Topological Stability of Smooth Mappings, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 552, Springer Verlag, 1976. The answer can be found in Proposition (1.3) Chap.I of the above reference.

Liviu Nicolaescu

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.