Good Url name and ways to have more people visit yourr website?

Car accident and uninsured, complicated situation. What to do?

  • Got in a car accident two years; car rental, uninsured. Complicated situation, car rental company wants $35K from me. What to do? When I rented a car in California two years ago, I got in an accident with another vehicle. To keep it simple and sweet, I came to a full stop at a 3-way intersection stop sign (a small road going into a main street). I looked both ways to make sure no incoming traffic was coming, then made a left turn. Out of the blue, a SUV/van came barreling into me. Luckily (very), the van hit the back door on the driver's side... barely avoiding hitting me directly. The damage to my car rental was pretty bad, although not too bad. I wasn't physically harmed, just shaken up and had a few minor bruises. The back door was totaled, and a tire blew out, I believe. The car had to be towed away to the local car rental office, where I did an exchange. The SUV sustained very little damage, other than the front bumper being bent. I got legal representation (gratis) through my father's friend, who helped me dissect the situation and contacted the necessary people. The couple on the other end of the accident were claiming serious injuries and damage to their car, and my lawyer helped make the necessary communication. Time passed, and after about 2 months after the accident, I stopped hearing from everyone involved (the car rental claims representative and my lawyer). My lawyer instructed me to contact him if any followup information or contact was initiated. Well, more than 1 1/2 years passed until I got a letter from the car rental company, asking for $35,000 ($15 thousand each for injuries; $5 thousand for the car damage done to the other SUV). My lawyer wrote a letter on my behalf, and the car rental company insisted that I pay in full or they would pursue further collection. I drafted an email to my lawyer, explaining my points and why I felt the whole situation was not working in my favor, and he bailed out. He said he felt the situation was no longer in his area of expertise, so now I'm on my own. Some facts to clarify the situation: a. I had a Loss Damage Waiver on my rental, which allowed me peace of mind if any damage was done to my car. Obviously, the car being damaged resulted in a loss, and I was not held responsible for this. b. I did not select the added liability insurance at the time; nor did I have any car insurance of my own. I did not select this, because the signage was not clear that California was exempted from being protected by the state minimums. All other states have minimums and require car rental companies to cover up to the state minimum, but California did not. That means I am on my own here in California. At the time, on the website (and still is), I was given the impression that California was covered. I want so badly to share the link, believe me, but I do not want this to be used against me, so I have to refrain from using the car rental company's name and thus providing a link to their website, but it is a major rental company, one of the top ones actually. c. I am Deaf, which obviously is not an excuse of any kind. However, I was not verbally communicated my opinions to be insured, and if California did not require any mandatory minimum coverage, they should have communicated that to me. Signage was present, but nothing that could be seen that clearly stated California was not covered for liability insurance. Therefore, I believe the burden lies on the car rental company in this situation, due to the miscommunication. I understand it takes time to communicate with a Deaf customer, but again, the burden is on them to ensure customers are clear about their options, regardless of any disabilities. d. The police report states that the couple involved refused medical at the scene. They, in fact, drove away. One of the two persons involved on the other end of the accident claimed a hurt arm, but the other person claimed no injuries. It's right there on the police report. So, at this point, the car rental claims/collections department wants $35,000, which is IMPOSSIBLE for me to pay, and my (now former) lawyer's letter asking them to forgo collecting any money from me and explaining my disability did not do any good. Now that I am not represented anymore, and I have no assets (already explained to the car rental company), I have no idea what to do. I do not have income, and this whole situation rubs me the wrong way. I understand accepting responsibility, but in this situation, I really feel I have been backed up in a corner with no recourse. I'm hoping to get some advice on how to move forward, along with insights. I know the obvious advice is to get legal representation, which I am considering doing, but it is expensive and would provide a difficulty for me. I also am living in the East coast in addition to having family in the West coast where I visit, so the whole situation is complicated. (My former lawyer is based where my family lives, and the accident, obviously, happened in California.) I am thinking of pushing the issue up to the management of the car rental company, or even contacting a consumer advocate, as it is bad PR for a car rental company to try and take $35,000 from a Deaf customer who was misled about his situation and his options. I also wanted to clarify that I do not expect legal advice, and any advice offered here will not be constructed by me as legal advice, so feel free to give any advice you can without worrying about me "taking it the wrong way." This has been really hard for me, and I hope to get some good solid advice other than getting legal representation. I hope my ideas are good as well. Thanks for your time!

  • Answer:

    Also, you need to anonymize this post ASAP, stop talking to the insurance company immediately, and keep quiet about the details to everyone but your lawyer. Seconded.

anonymous at Ask.Metafilter.Com Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Don't declare bankruptcy without pursuing legal advice for. There is only one answer here, and that's to hire a lawyer; it might suck, but without one, you're going to be hurting financially, more so than the cost of the lawyer. Also, you need to anonymize this post ASAP, stop talking to the insurance company immediately, and keep quiet about the details to everyone but your lawyer.

ellF

Your first attorney did a very very poor job. Your reasons for why you're not liable don't count, btw! A good lawyer will have other, better reasons to get you out of this mess. Get a good lawyer licensed in CA. The only thing you should bring doing on metafilter is asking for referrals to a very good lawyer! I think there is good reason to believe you are not legally required to reimburse this company, I'm in CA, had accident in a rental car without insurance, blah blah LAWYER. You need a lawyer. So much easier than wringing your hands or declaring bankruptcy. Lawyer.

jbenben

The OP should not talk to the CEO of the company. The OP should consult with another lawyer.

scody

Nthing the necessity of having this handled by counsel. And there is an important, important lesson here that readers of this question in the future may want to know. SO many people think that signing the LDW and paying $12 a day or whatever indemnifies you against damage done to other parties. Many others think the "car rental coverage" on their major credit card does the same. So wrong. Those things *only* cover the car you rent. They cover no medical costs for anyone, and no property damage to anything but the car you rent, which is the most predictable and minor element of liability you incur in any serious accident. You must either have your own car insurance (and make sure it covers you to reasonably robust limits in all rental situations -- many policies, for example, don't apply to rental trucks) or you must have a personal liability policy, or at a minimum you must pay the $12 or whatever a day for the rental company's minimal liability insurance (usually $100K, enough for most modest accidents, but hardly a perfect shield if you have any assets). It is far, far more important to have this insurance than to have the LDW/credit card coverage on your rental vehicle, unless you rent expensive cars maybe. I can handle a $20K loss if I total the average car I rent (and I'm covered for that by my credit cards anyway). A lot harder handling $100K in medical bills or someone's totaled Audi.

spitbull

A lawyer might be expensive, but NO lawyer will be MORE expensive. Do not communicate with the rental company, the insurance agency or anyone else: Get A Lawyer Now. Sorry, but there just isn't any other answer.

easily confused

The OP's story does not make any sense. A claim for damages would be presented as a lawsuit by the claimant, not as a letter from the rental car company demanding payment for injuries. Perhaps the occupants of the SUV sued the rental car company (as owner of the vehicle) and that the rental car company paid them (as a settlement?) and now wants reimbursement. If such a lawsuit had been filed, it would have tried to contact the OP, but maybe did not have accurate contact information. OP needs to consult legal counsel.

megatherium

I am thinking of pushing the issue up to the management of the car rental company, or even contacting a consumer advocate, as it is bad PR for a car rental company to try and take $35,000 from a Deaf customer who was misled about his situation and his options I don't think you will get very far pushing the Deaf angle. It doesn't sound to me like there was a miscommunication or that you were misled or treated any differently than a hearing customer (they don't spend much time explaining the legal details to anyone, the signage is pretty much the extent of it). A lawyer may be able to make your case more convincingly than you have here.

ook

About hiring a lawyer: Can your father's friend recommend anyone? The question I ask is "if you were in this situation, who would YOU want handling your case?" Most reputable attorneys will be willing to have an initial consultation for free where they will outline what they can do for you (without making promises about outcome) and detail the potential costs involved. Also, there may be legal aid services available to you. The http://www.lafla.org/ might be able to help you, or direct you to someone who can. About the statute of limitations, generally: The law limits the amount of time anyone can wait to act on a claim. California assuredly has a such a limit, but I don't know what that is. At some point, any potential plaintiff will have to file suit or lose their right to collect. About litigation, generally: Anyone can ask anyone to pay them money (with some exceptions, like blackmail and fraud). Sending a letter and hoping someone pays is quite a lot easier and than going to court. Convincing a defendant (especially an unrepresented one) to pay is frequently easier than establishing a right to collect in court. It is the plaintiff who must bring the case. It is the plaintiff who has the brunt of staying within the statute of limitations. The defendant must assuredly respond--and frequently incur costs doing so. But the defendant must go through a cost-benefit analysis: is there any benefit for me doing anything now? Will the defendant be better off spending money (or time or effort or "psychological aggravation") RIGHT NOW, or is it better to leave the ball in the plaintiff's court? Those are some very general points that you (preferably with the guidance of a lawyer) can apply to your situation.

GPF

"Don't declare bankruptcy without pursuing legal advice first.".

ellF

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.