What are career options outside of academia for someone with an astronomy Ph.D.?
-
What are career options outside of academia for someone with an astronomy Ph.D.? The forseeable end of a second astronomy post-doc position (two is a typical number of postdocs in this field) has given rise to the following question â what are career options OUTSIDE of academia for someone with an astronomy Ph.D. who either chooses to leave the field or fails to get a professorial job? Other than a few limited options (support astronomy at an observatory, teaching), it is very difficult to get any good information on this from within the astronomy community, as it is all geared towards academia. What are other options? What other employers might be looking for someone with such a degree or related skills? How do you find out about them, research them, apply for them? What are the pros and cons of the positions â the hours, the community, the location?
-
Answer:
kyrademon at Ask.Metafilter.Com Visit the source
Other answers
Federal labs (two of my friends with astronomy PhDs are at NASA Goddard) - apply through http://www.usajobs.gov (but easier to hear about openings if you talk to people you know who work at those places) Software development (especially for a defense contractor if you can get security clearance) - I met more than a few PhD physicists around here. Quantitative Finance - talk to a recruiter If you're at a university, especially one with a large science/engineering community, I highly suggest speaking with people in the career office and looking at which companies are recruiting on campus, especially in the above fields.
deanc
I have an Astronomy PhD and, after two (teaching-focused) postdocs, was lucky enough to get a job teaching at a small liberal arts college (just started this semester). Here's a sampling of some things my friends (with Astronomy PhDs) are doing outside the traditional "professor" track: *Working for banks: I have friends who work in a few different positions at investment banks. One works doing modeling of the markets and trying to take advantage of small changes in the larger indices to make money. His comment on this is that "data are data" and what they try to do is model a set of data and explain the forces driving it. It turns out that there's a surprising number of similarities between calculating the tidal forces on galaxies and figuring out what is driving a stock up and down (this is grossly simplified, of course, but you get the point). One of the things that this friend actually said though, is that you shouldn't think of banking as an alternative to the traditional career track. While a lot of your skills transfer, you shouldn't think, "Oh; the professor thing didn't work out, so I guess I'll do banking." If you're interested in banking, by all means do it, but don't think of it as another type of professorship; the work and culture is very, very different from academia. *Working for defense contractors: I have a friend who works for one of the big defense contractors. The same sort of "data are data" argument applies here. If you understand how to think quantitatively about problems, people who want missiles to fly straight have interest in you. *Working in an advisory position: I have a friend who almost became an AAAS fellow, in which she would have been advising US Representatives about science (she ended up taking another position). But that's only a one year position, so you'd have to look at spinning that into something more permanent if this was the road you were interested in. *Working at a planetarium: If teaching is more up your alley, trying to find a university or science museum that wants/needs an astronomer to run their planetarium. This isn't quite "outside academia," but it's an option. The general theme of these (particularly the first two) is that they rely on thinking clearly and quantitatively about problems. Those are the skills you have and any sort of field that uses those skills (defense, banking, accounting, engineering) will have use for you. It's funny; I was just talking about this with one of my students ~an hour ago. Feel free to MeMail me if you have more questions or want to talk more about your specific situation. A lot of it is going to depend what you're interested in doing, so you could also post more specifics here if want more targeted advice.
Betelgeuse
There are a number of scientists who work in science policy, generally in government. Check out the AAAS Science & Technology http://fellowships.aaas.org/02_Areas/02_Congressional.shtml, and for other ideas of places to look, look at the various places http://fellowships.aaas.org/02_Areas/02_CongressionalFellows.shtml have been placed and are working now. This http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/jobs.html of links might also be helpful. And of course check out NASA and related federal labs, especially if you are interested in program or contract management.
Mr.Know-it-some
Rather than looking at it from the perspective of "what jobs are there for someone with an astronomy Ph.D.", you may find it more enlightening to consider "what jobs are there for someone with this particular skillset". I would guess that the skillset in this case would include a good background in maths and possibly programming/modelling experience? Presumably there would also be a good understanding of how materials interact. Possibilities might be the financial or energy sectors (geophysics, for example, would not be too much of a leap).
oclipa
Software development, particularly if you have hands on experience with digital signal processing, data management, etc. I used to interview a lot of software engineer candidates at Google and some of my favourites were always the physics PhDs. I could care less about their minute research of quantum gravity's effect on ocean eddy currents or whatever, but often in the pursuit of research the students would have written a lot of very impressive software. If you want to pursue this path, polish up your software portfolio, summarize your expertise, and put any code you can online as an open source release.
Nelson
If you're not opposed to going back to school, you could do an MSc in medical physics. Since you already have a PhD, you would be an attractive candidate as a clinical medical physicist.
Premeditated Symmetry Breaking
I know someone who left academia with her PhD after one or two postdocs, and is now very happy working as an analyst for a large city government. As I understand it her position involves floating among many departments figuring out how to use data they have to answer complex questions they have - so she might do analysis of traffic data, or of crime data, to determine patterns and give information to decisionmakers about what to prioritize. So basically you'd look for a position that needs someone with good quantitative and data analysis skills.
LobsterMitten
A guy I met is an astrophysicist who is an ex-academic -- became a software engineer. He was pretty early at VMware.
rr
Related Q & A:
- Can someone tell me what a career in advertising would be like?Best solution by aef.com
- What are some career options for an art history major?
- What are some different career options for a Computer major?Best solution by Quora
- What can you do with a Ph.D in computer science?Best solution by scienceforums.net
- What are the pros and cons of a Ph.D?Best solution by postgrad.com
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.