Why should graffiti be considered as art?

Cavemen: Was cave art considered graffiti at the time?

  • Was it praised as "art", or did cavemen look down upon it as "graffiti"?

  • Answer:

    Well the prevalent theory is that it most likely has to do something with hunting ruituals. By depicting an animal, ancient man hoped to trap a soul of the animal it was hunting. Animalism and magic. So it could be said that the cave paintings were sort of first cathedrals.

Mate Mihaljević at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

This is a tricky one to pin down.  Large works of art, such as the Lascaux cave art, were most certainly not made on a whim, and were likely associated with ritual and spirituality, owing to the sacred nature of caves in Paleolithic Europe.  It's important to keep in mine that to the paleolithic peoples, caves were sacred sites, they were significant features on the landscape, and therefore not something you'd abuse.   Given the examples we have found in cave art, it seems even the act of making making an image was seen as a sacred one.  Our current understanding of graffiti is one of counter-culture.  In a modern context, it is used to make political or social statements, and by placing them on buildings or structures, it is an attack on establishment.  It's a product of our current civilisation, which Paleolithic peoples would not have yet experienced.  So I would tend to say, no, it was not seen as graffiti.

Owen Budd

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.