Small Business Advice: Investor has $50,000 for 1/3 of startup company, founders have only $20,000 for 2/3 of company. How to go about allocating shares as well as share prices?
-
During the in corporation of a company, my business partner and I decided to put in $1000 for 1000 shares in the new company. The equity was split 33%, 67%. So I had 670 shares, and business partner had 330 shares. Soon after, an investor came along and he wanted to put in $50,000 for 1/3 share of the company. However, our shares were 'purchased' at $/share hence $1000 gave us 1000 shares. If the investor purchases shares from the company at $1/share he would have 50,000 shares which will easily dwarf the shares that the founders own. This would not make any sense. So, the founders decided to put in $10,000 each and each get 1/3 share of the company. We indicated that we would use the $20,000 ($10,000 each x 2) to purchase our total shares at $0.20/share instead of $1/share to make it 100,000 shares (0.2 x 100,000). Now that we have 100,000 shares, and the investor has 50,000 shares, we would then be able to allocate 1/3 share to the investor as 50,000 shares over 150,000 shares make 1/3. So that being said, we now have a paid up capital of $70,000 (10,000 + 10,000 +50,000) and the total shares at 150,000 shares. We posted this to the corporate secretary handling our incorporation to process it as the new company structure, we were told that this cannot be done. Mainly because of the share price difference i.e $0.20/share and $1/share. The problem in summary is this: An investor is coming in with $50,000 for 1/3 of the company. We have only $20,000 for 2/3 of the company. How do we structure the share prices to make it so that we have 2/3 shares of the company and the investor has 1/3 shares of the company even though we have a smaller monetary contribution. Of course if my understanding of this whole share price issue is totally warped, please feel free to correct me. Thanks.
-
Answer:
Not a lawyer. If the investor has already bought the shares he has control and has to approve you diluting him. Which probably isn't going to happen. If he hasn't bought the shares - given you the cash yet - then he probably has a reasonable expectation of control and doing what you are suggesting would either kill the deal or poison the relationship. I would go back and explain that you screwed up and renegotiate. (Obviously various ways of doing this without sounding too stupid) There is always more money out there if he walks away but it is far far better to resolve this quickly and cheaply now. Trust me in this. You need totally inside partners and investors. I had to kick a co-founder out and we'd made a 50/50 split. That sucked AND it caused so many secondary problems down the line that it was one of the principal causes of failure. Also - just with you and your co-founder - there is a gear podcast by Noah Wasserman at the Stanford Entrepreneurship corner (it's a podcast from Standford on iTunes to) that talks about equity split and co-founders. And by the sound of it you really need an entrepreneurship lawyer here - not a standard company secretary
Denis Oakley at Quora Visit the source
Other answers
You've over complicated this for no reason. This is an elementary way of putting it but just to show you how simple it is: You owned 670 shares Your partner 330 shares for a total company share of 1,000 Lets say you both decide to give up half your shares to this new partner for a new split of: 50, 33.5,16.5 (It's important to first discuss how much you each want to give up and what percentage you want of the company) You sell your shares 335 at $100 a share Your partner sells their 165 shares at $100 a share for a total investment from the new partner at $50,000.00 You can sell your shares for how ever much you want to, they're your shares.
Anonymous
Well, the reason why your corporate secretary says it cannot happen is probably due to the fact that you can't issue shares to yourself at a discount to the face value, which I'm assuming is at $1. But you can always issue new shares at a premium provided you are able to justify the valuations. Assume you have issued share to the two founder at face value, then total shares issued to founders would be 21,000. Now, if the new investor should get 1/3rd and founder get 2/3rd, then the total shares outstanding should be 31,500 (21,000*3/2) and new shares to be issued to the investor would be 10,500 at an issue price of $4.76 ($50,000/10,500). If this doesn't work, you can consider issuing sweat equity to founders to the extent of the difference to make post investment equity split at 1/3rd and 2/3rd. Hope this helps!!!!
Tarun Sharma
Related Q & A:
- How do you go about starting your own small business?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Is 20,000 1 a high contrast ratio?Best solution by h10010.www1.hp.com
- Is there any way to connect USB in computers to Playstation 1/2/3's controller?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- How do you jailbreak your iPod touch version 3.1.3?Best solution by wikihow.com
- How do you multiple 1 2/3 by 3 1/8?Best solution by themathpage.com
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.