If DSP company A delivers 3X CTR when buying on Ad Exchanges then company B, can it price(charge) 3X higher CPM's?
-
For the matter of question lets assume that CTR is the only indicator of quality
-
Answer:
Your question implies some confusion between different pricing models. Let me try and outline the different varieties available in the market. DSPs traditionally work on a cost-plus model: i.e., they charge you the exact CPM (cost per thousand) price that they have paid to the exchange and then they add a fixed margin to cover their own cost, typically ranging from 5 to 10% for self-service (you only use their technology) and from 15 to 30% for full service (you use their teams and advice in addition to their technology). So the simple answer to your question is ânoâ: if DSP A buys the same inventory as DSP B, they should charge you the same CPM, plus the margin you have agreed upon. Of course, this cost-plus model is not necessarily tied to a CPM pricing structure. It is perfectly possible that the DSP charges you the CPC (cost per click) or even CPA (cost per acquisition) that they have paid to somebody else and adds the same margin on top. Some DSPs already do so for display advertising on Facebook, which has CPC pricing. But since your question is about buys on ad exchanges, CPM is implied. Ad exchanges sell on a CPM basis only, since they have no way of tracking post-impression effects like brand lift, click-through or acquisition. A good DSP _is_ able to track these post-impression effects and can optimize their choice of inventory so that they maximize the objective the client wants to reach, e.g. more click-throughs. In your example, DSP A is optimizing the campaign for click-throughs and we can assume that it is buying different and probably more expensive inventory than DSP B buys, so as to achieve this higher click-through rate. This means that DSP A is paying more to the exchange, and therefore can also charge you a higher CPM (plus associated margin). Advanced DSPs, however, would make sure that the better inventory generates proportionally more click-throughs than just the increase in price would warrant. In other words, they would try to generate 3X click-throughs at 2X or 2.5X CPM price. So the not-so-simple answer to your question is ânot quiteâ: if DSP A optimizes the campaign more than DSP B, you can expect the CPM to become more expensive but not quite as expensive that it would nullify all the benefits of the optimization. Finally, the best DSPs (such as , my employer) are able to predict the market so accurately that they can take away a lot of marketer risk and "guarantee" conversions within a certain CPA constraint, or any other measurable objective that the marketer wants to reach.
Roland Siebelink at Quora Visit the source
Other answers
The answer seems to be asking about the DSP revenue model - and since DSPs are typically compensated as a percentage of spend, so then the customer should be getting the benefit of the 3x CTR at whatever the cost is. The DSP benefits by having the customer be able to spend more for better media performance. If this performance improved because of 3x higher CPMs paid to publishers then the client should be indifferent EXCEPT that they may be paying more to the DSP... In which case they would prefer the cheaper media. DSPs who charge on fixed CPM are usually more correctly referred to as ad networks.
Rob Leathern
In this case, the optimal revenue model is CPC. If the campaign is billed on a CPC basis, Company A earns 3x that of Company B for effectively 3x performance efficiency (if we assume equal CPMs/inventory cost for each). The advertiser's budget is thus split between Company A and B based on performance - the better performing DSP receives the greater budget share because, essentially, they earned it. Simply inflating the CPMs would ultimately inflate CPCs and CPAs and reduce ROI for advertisers, thereby increasing the cost of the campaign for no real additional performance return.
Ashley Elizabeth
If one sets aside the math for a moment (which I think is fairly well explained already), there is also the challenge of the optics when looking at these problems. If company B was charging $5 CPMs for traffic, it would be hard for company A to charge $15 CPMs because it is simply difficult to explain to advertisers why an agency would pay $15 CPMs for inventory. Optics change as the prices modulate - it might be easy for company A to claim "That $0.50 inventory is low quality, you should pay $1.50 for my higher quality inventory". So managing expectations is an important element to pricing as well - rarely is selling something on CPM a matter of just the math, perception is critical as well.
Brent Halliburton
Related Q & A:
- What should I look for when buying a DVD recorder?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What are some things I should look for when buying a snowboard (URGENT?Best solution by Quora
- Can ebay safe to use when buying stuff?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What should be looking into when buying a motorcycle?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What should I consider when buying a camcorder?Best solution by Amazon Askville
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.