Political Theory: What caused communism or socialism to fail?
-
When I was a boy and not invested in critical thinking I got my news from the media or the adults appointed with raising me. In that time I saw the collapse of the Soviet Union. Through media I was taught that communism or socialism, where no one owned anything and everyone worked for the state and not for personal wealth had failed and capitolism or the current American system had triumphed over socialism. Did socialism really fail and have we seen it employed in any form be it commune, city state or state?
-
Answer:
Communism has never been truly attempted by any nation. The nations which most people refer to as communist (the Soviet Union, China, North Korea, Cuba, etc) are not really communist at all, but authoritarian socialists. A society is not communist until it is completely classless. The nations mentioned above were far from classless, because the state stands/stood way above the common worker. It is a common myth that the state controls everything in a communist society, but this is as far from the truth as you can get. To accomplish a classless society, the state has to be ABOLISHED, just like Karl Marx originally idealized. But what about socialism? Has it failed? Yes and no. There are many different forms of socialism. Communism is one of them. We can not claim that socialism as a whole has failed until we have tried every implementation. The individual NATIONS have failed, not the ideology. I'd also like to contest the claim that capitalism has triumphed. It is true that the most successful nations are capitalist societies, but this is also true for many of the least successful countries. The poverty in Africa, India, etc, is a DIRECT result of capitalism. One nation can not become successful without impoverishing three others. Not to mention that capitalism is the reason the working class feels the need to revolt against the state and the bourgeoise in the first place. The idea that socialism/communism has failed is nothing more than an American illusion.
Simon Hansson at Quora Visit the source
Other answers
I see three main factors; inability to plan the economy, lack of motivation and dictatorship.Inability to plan the economyThe command economy works with an idea that you can predict what and how much the people will buy. Therefore you produce only what you need and no surplus of useless goods.But it wasn't working. People buy some stuff because they do it every day (e.g. bread for breakfast) or because they have to (gas for cars). You can perhaps predict that. But other things are bought completely randomly. And you can't predict that. Therefore what follows are periodic random shortages of various goods which is something that everyone who lived in a socialist/communist state is familiar with.Lack of motivationWhen you invent something in capitalism you have it patented, you can find your own company and get super rich. In socialism/communism when you invent something you get a medal and that's it. If Mikhail Kalashnikov lived in a capitalist country he would've become a multi billionaire and CEO of his own giant weapons company. But he lived in a socialist/communist state and received almost nothing.Basically the people weren't properly rewarded for their additional activities and ideas. They got only medal. That worked when the people believed in the goals of the regime. When they stopped believing the stopped striving. And the economy and worker's productivity suffered because of it.In capitalist countries when you strive you get more money. So the people strive hard.DictatorshipPeople like freedoms of expression, travel etc. And democracy gives that. But socialist/communist state doesn't since it's a dictatorship.People can be happy in a dictatorship but as a compensation for the limited freedoms the dictatorship had to offer something; a nationalist feelings of pride, better economy etc.Socialist/communist states never managed to offer an alternative. Better economy? No way. Pride on the regime or country? That was limited and would work even in capitalism.And once the people visited Western countries they found out how miserable their own lives are. They stopped trying to help the regime and only tolerated it. And once the regimes weakened and/or people got bolder the regimes have fallen.
Jakub HandlÃÅ
The problem with communism and socialism is that the real power is consentrated in hands of burocracy. They decide what and where to grow, plant, produce and how to distribute. This system will never be stable in terms of math if the outside restrictions would not be put on the type and quantity of consumption. It is awful. At the end of 80th in Moscow there were only three ultrasound diagnostic systems (for more than 6 million people).
Nimfa Beau
Related Q & A:
- What are the consequences of adopting a pass or fail grading system?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What caused my monitor to suddenly get darker?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What is the Greenhouse effect caused by?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- What is Communism?Best solution by en.wikipedia.org
- What is the difference between social theory and sociological theory?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.