Green energy solutions?

Why electricity utility companies do not focus on providing renewable energy solutions directly on people's houses over large scale installations?

  • Installing solar panels on roofs instead of building big schemes and transmission lines. OK, this seems trivial, someone has to have been thinking about this. If  utility  companies installed renewable solutions on people's homes, instead of constructing gigantic utility generation stations, so still owning the infrastructure and selling energy to the customers, would that be a viable business model? Could this system work? Would this  not create lots of clean energy innovation, improve coverage, distribute generation,etc...

  • Answer:

    This question somehow made me remember the person thinking 9 woman can deliver 1 baby in a month. In PV business there is a simple saying: "A free-field is the perfect rooftop." Rooftop PV is hard. It is so hard, sometimes it is not possible to build considering commercial, technical factors. Especially family houses where rooftops are not designed flat. Some reasons below: 1) Roof material may not be applicable for module holding structure. 2) Roof geometry might not allow good sun angle over a year. 3) Roofs are on houses, houses are near other buildings, thus many possibilities for near shading objects. Free field plant, though, is usually simple: 1) Ground is usually near flat so you can choose the angle of modules and have options to reach perfect installed capacity-produced energy balance a.k.a IRR. (Except countries like Japan) 2) Mounting racks may be installed with simple piles rammed in ground. 3) Any shading object near can be cut. These are usually some trees in the middle of nowhere. Cutting trees for renewable might sound like bombing for freedom, however in comparison a PV plant has more contribution to the nature. I see it, as if replacing trees with their "robot counterparts". (Sorry no references but I guess you can google this) Let's also not forget economies of scale. And finally big utilities have no possibility to use resources on many small projects. A project is a project. From workload perspective there is not much difference between big or small project. These all are the reasons why usually rooftop incentives are much higher than free field.

Tuna Kildis at Quora Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Its much more expensive to install, maintain and transmit 100 sites generating 10kW each than it is building 1 site with 1000kW. You need 100 inverters, 100 meters, 100 grid connections. 100 site visits, 100 monthly cleans, 100 site assessments to check for shadows etc. The panel itself scales linearly but everything else doesn't. A 1000kW inverter costs much less than 100 10kw ones. The only reason people put them on their own roofs are: -subsidies are often higher for these 'reterofit' applications -homeowners accept much lower returns on investment 3-4% (particularly returns on equity) than companies... PE is looking for 20%+ on equity. -there are added social aspects (isn't my house cool!) You do arguably get the 'land' for free... But then open, dry, sunny (I.e. desert) land is pretty cheap!

Richard Davies

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.