Is it possible to create hidden service with django?

Will this cure the debt crisis?

  • We are exporting much of our disposable cash to China and investors are sitting on the rest of the disposable cash because consumers can’t spend because investors are sitting on the rest of the disposable cash. Therefore, government must supply disposable cash to consumers by investing $1T annually in much needed infrastructure. Consider this apparent contradiction: On one hand, by printing money, the Treasury could cause inflation. On the other, by printing money, China is eating our lunch with its inflation under 3.3%! Q: Why do conservatives worry most about inflation when the Fed can stop inflation on a dime? A: Because they don’t understand these economic truths: Waste = Time X Idle Resources (unemployed millions, closed plants, etc.) Wealth (GDP) = Time X Idle Resources X Investment By investing in Idle Resources, a successful economy minimizes waste and maximizes wealth. Every minute that Idle Resources spend NOT creating wealth is a lost opportunity that cannot be regained. Q: How does the GDP grow? A: With $xxx…, Investor A creates a product by hiring Idle Resources (Contractor B, Vendor C, Utility D, etc.). With the $xxx…, B, C, and D, etc., hire workers and purchase from vendors who pay salaries to employees who spend money at retailers who hire B, C, and D, etc., ad infinitum. By the multiplier effect, $xxx… grows as much as 250% (according to the Congressional Budget Office) and is added to the GDP. Q: Who is Investor A? A: Exxon can construct an oil well or the federal government can construct the Interstate Highway System. Q: Does it matter where government gets the money? A: Not to the Idle Resource that gets hired. As long as the money hires Idle Resources to create wealth, the source can be tax revenue, bond sales, or computer keyboards. Q: Can government create money out of thin air? A: China does it successfully. The Fed did it with TARP and with many hidden deals. Q: Doesn’t printing money cause inflation? A: Inflation occurs when the money supply grows faster than the goods supply. When printed money hires Idle Resources to create goods, inflation cannot occur because both money and goods grow equally. To insure that only Idle Resources are hired, government monitors prices, wages, and unemployment as a signal to slow printing money and building infrastructure. Q: In our history, have we ever printed large amounts of money successfully without causing inflation? A: Yes, indeed! Lincoln financed the Civil War by (really) printing “greenbacks” which never lost their value. Roosevelt financed World War II by having the Fed buy Treasury securities “…in any amount and at any price…” Without serious inflation, workers and returning veterans used those dollars to create our golden age. Peace or war, there is no logical reason that printed money will cause inflation by hiring Idle Resources. Q: Will other nations accept our printed dollars? A: Other nations will compare our currency to theirs by our relative productivities and GDP growth, both of which will increase with heavy infrastructure investment. Q: How will printing money relieve the debt crisis? A: Rather than our debt, it is our debt-to-GDP ratio that matters - somewhat. But, to reduce the debt, we would need an impossible stream of large surplus budgets and trade balances. Therefore, we must reduce our debt-to-GDP ratio by lifting GDP with infrastructure investments made by printing money when there are Idle Resources. Q: Why is our debt so large? A: To finance the deficit, the Fed has enriched the rich over the last century by paying interest on bonds sold at market rate. As a service to the financial market, the Fed should only sell bonds at an interest rate slightly above the inflation rate. The rich (and China) will gladly buy our bonds at any rate. Q: How should we finance a budget deficit? A: The Fed should lend the amount of the deficit to the Treasury. Since both are government institutions, the interest rate would have no effect on the budget. Therefore, a zero percent rate would end debt interest expense and end the debt crisis. Q: Is borrowing from a government bank more inflationary than borrowing from a private bank? A: No, it is actually less inflationary because we would no longer increase the money supply with debt interest payments. Indeed, during boom times, when inflation is a threat and the budget has a rare surplus, the Fed would no longer increase the money supply by redeeming bonds. Q: Will the debt keep growing as before? A: Yes, but it will not include the amount of debt interest currently paid to bond-holders. And, since there will be no debt crisis, our debt will just be what we owe to ourselves, innocuous numbers in a ledger.

  • Answer:

    Look.....I don't want to be condescending, but you have so many premises wrong that I don't know where to start. Greenbacks never lost their value? Have you tried to spend one lately? Let me cut to the chase here. One thing that you must understand is that the Federal Reserve is not part of the Federal Government. I will leave a link below to an enlightening book by Edward Griffin on the subject. In this book he describes the "Mandrake Principle" where the Fed and the Government engage in creating inflation by printing both Treasuries and the money to pay for them. It is an utter heist and we are now witnessing the end game of an almost 100 yr old scam started in 1913. Remember, they create the principle with their method, but not the interest to pay back the criminal enterprise which is the Federal Reserve Bank. New debt must created to pay back the old with interest...over and over..,until the "crack up boom" described by Edwin Von Mises. Inflation is a monetary phenomenon. And if a country could print their way out of debt, then we would have already seen it by now in human history. I'm sorry but your Question and Answer session makes no sense...perhaps you could pose each question, one at the time, because at this point you have every answer wrong. There is one sentence that should be ingrained in large letters over the Senate floor..... THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH! Seriously....I mean no offense....this is an extremely important topic to us all. Feel free to email me if you like.

marvinsu... at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

sounds like you need a basic econ class

Wendle L

You could have saved a lot of typing by simply stating that you don't have even a slight understanding of economics. Almost nothing you said has any basis in fact or reality.

Bob G...The return of

Two things stop debt Stop spending Stop taxing Do that and you grow your econmy 40 fold over night Imagine an employee who doesn't have any income tax, no land tax, no death tax, no medicad, no Medicare, no social security. Employers have no corporate taxes, etc... They only tax Is a 5% sales tax You to that and cut all government programs, but police and military then your encomey would fly and put the world to shame.

Buck Rogers Twin Homie

Look at per capita consumption for US vs China, and you will understand why China is trying to manage it's growth. Inflation of supply price, and deflation of after purchase physical assets = monetized debt. Right now the worlds economy does not have enough liquid and physical asset evaluation to make good on the debt and interest outstanding (omitting human worth of course). Plus inflation reduces consumption in those markets, which is good, when your competitor is getting rich selling you junk that winds up in the trash in two years. That consumption per capita is my answer. It is not logistically sustainable (pretty straight forward math here total population+per capita consumption-resource supply, you are letting the money confuse you). Western markets over consume, and emerging markets are beginning to catch up. Sure I am ignoring intellectual property...but this has always been per capita under valued in the market. By the way, the "idle resource" in your model is rapidly becoming obsolete, and is not often hired to do anything that instills feelings of pride or accomplishment.

MTR 2.0

TL;DR

Entropy

"Why not just state the flaws in my argument - if you find some?" I dont have all day to respond to respond to a 15 part question, so I'll just take your first paragraph. Nobody is "sitting on money" unless you want to show me all these ppl stuffing it in their mattres. The money is either in investments or in banks. Bank have their money in T-bills (the goverment) because of the uncertainty in the market. We've done 3 rounds of quantitative easing which was designed to essentially do what you are pretending will work, in an attempt to lower returns on T-bills and start banks lending yet here we stand. So since what you are suggesting has been tried 3 times now and hasn't worked, what else do you have? In the meantime any extra money anyone had is not going into essentials like food and gas because the money they had now has decreased in value due to inflation. Also if you actually believe in your waste calculation you should then realized that removing money from the government is the solution because when the goverment moves money from one set of ppl to another set of ppl there is no product or service created from the exchange, it simply changes hands so all of that cycle of that money has been suspended from creating the need for work to be in to facilitate its exchange and that transaction is simply wasted. Will doing what you suggest get the economy moving? Well we've done it several times now and here we are, so what do you think the answer to that question is?

Thedude27

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.