Which is the better camera...Cannon or Nikon?
-
I'm trying to save for my first SLR camera but have no idea which one to buy. When I do buy one it will be either a Cannon or Nikon. However I'm not sure which camera would fit my needs better. I need a camera that will shoot excellent macro shots (true macro if possible) with a shallow depth of field and great / amazing clarity. These things are a must as I shoot mostly close-up or macro flower shots. If possible I would also love the camera to be able to take beautiful landscape shots. Right now I'm working on a Fuji FinePix S4500 and the clarity and shallow depth of field on this camera is lacking something terrible. Not sure if it's just cause it's new and I'm not acquainted with everything it can do. Anyway if someone could give some advice as to which camera ... Cannon or Nikon would be better suited for my needs I would greatly appreciate it. Thank You!
-
Answer:
It's Canon, not Cannon. There is no better brand. And it's a three horse race, Sony Alpha cameras should be on your list as well. Each brand or camera systems brings with it pros and cons. Not only is all that too lengthy to list here, but it's been answered here every single day in one form or the other for the past few years, sometimes several times a day. It's up to you to do the research. It could take a few weeks honestly of reading a few articles every day, just various reviews about all the Nikon, Sony and Canon dSLRs, learning the terms, and picking up some photography knowledge along the way. There are no dSLR/dSLT cameras that take great macro shots or shallow depth of field. That's a lens thing, not a camera thing. You are still stuck in a compact camera mindset. That's OK, it's going to take time to stop thinking that way, to stop thinking in terms of "zoom" numbers and megapixels. To take great macro shots, you'll need a true macro lens, for landscapes, you'll need a wide-ish angle lens, and it needs to be sharp. Don't get caught up in people telling you that one brand is the best, they are being dishonest, and they aren't doing anything to help you. You'll need to examine the different systems and models and decide for yourself. If your budget is enough for an entry level dSLR, you will be looking at Nikon's D3100, D3200, Canon's T3, T2i, T3i, and Sony's A37, and probably their best overall entry level model the A57. Read all the reviews you can find, and check You tube they have lots of great reviews too.
dizzyliz... at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Other answers
Nikon, a cannon is a weapon. If you only know two manufacturers and can't spell one of them, you aren't ready for a DSLR.
Andrew
I have some advice, but you probably won't like it.... The Fujifilm Finepix S4500 is a lower end bridge camera. It can only do so much. It can take nice photos, but you have to take the time to learn how to use it. It's not the camera, it's the person behind it.... Depth of field has to do with the lens, not the camera. It's Canon, not Cannon... Nikon & Canon both make excellent cameras. Two good entry level cameras are the Nikon D3100, and the Canon Rebel T3. Now for my advice....Go to the nearest library and see what kind of books they have for a beginner photographer. You may also want to read the owners manual for the S4500. This camera is capable of very good photos.
Vinegar Taster
It is all personal preference. I used to own Canon, but I dumped them after they instantly obsoleted all of my lenses in the '80s by changing the lens mount - which meant I would have to buy all new lenses. At that point I went to Nikon and have never regretted my decision.
AWBoater
Look at reviews of the models of both manufacturers. Both make excellent cameras for your needs. A lot of the pros have both.
Robert
Never heard of the Cannon brand.
AVDADDY
The body of the camera, be it Canon or Nikon or Sony or Pentax, makes very little difference. If you stick to similar priced models, you will find that you can do anything you want with any of them. You can't tell a Canon print from a Nikon print, or any of the others for that matter. The only real difference between them is how they feel in your hand. The things you want to do require the proper lenses and accessories, not any specific camera. A good macro lens on any of the brands will give you what you want, as will a good wide angle lens for landscapes. Of course you have to learn the proper way to get the shots you want, or you are just wasting your time and money.
Caoedhen
Related Q & A:
- Which is the better place to do an MSc in theoretical physics, Imperial College London or Perimeter Institute?Best solution by Quora
- Which bike is better tvs apache or new cbz?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Which amp is better for a 15'' mtx 9500?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Which course is better dentistry or nursing?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- Which point and shoot camera takes good indoor pictures?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.