Name the three tests that courts use to determine whether a law or action violates the Equal Protection Clause?
-
Name the three tests that courts use to determine whether a law or action violates the Equal Protection Clause. How do they differ and do you believe that it is necessary to have three separate tests or could one test suffice? Can you guys help me with as much information you have on these two questions as possible?
-
Answer:
The first or lowest level of test is the rational basis test. A law which treats people differently according to classification X (whether that's age, economic status, sexual orientation, or countless other kinds of classifications) will be upheld so long as X is rationally related to some legitimate purpose. This standard presumes that the laws being challenged are permissible. Most laws are upheld. The second or intermediate test is the heightened scrutiny test. A law which treats people differently according to sex or illegitimacy of childbirth will be struck down unless the classification is substantially related to an important governmental goal. This standard presumes the laws are impermissible. Many, but not all, laws are struck down. The third or highest test is the strict scrutiny test. A law which treats people differently according to race will be struck down unless the law is narrowly tailored to a compelling governmental goal. This standard also presumes the laws are impermissible. Almost all laws are struck down. I, personally, do not believe that the courts should have created this multi-tiered system. The first two standards are nothing more than legislating from the bench; they do not at all fulfill the known goal of "the people" who adopted the 14th Amendment. History makes it perfectly clear that the Equal Protection Clause was intended to ban racial discrimination by government. There is no other known purpose. "The people" who adopted the 14th wouldn't even allow women to vote. They referred to gay men as "sodomites." And illegitimate children?!?!? The first two standards are self-awarded opportunities for judges to strike down laws they do not like.
shaketta at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source
Related Q & A:
- How to check whether a cell in a DataGridView is changed or not?Best solution by Stack Overflow
- How to find out whether a shape has touched another shape?Best solution by Stack Overflow
- How costly is it to renovate an old barn, into a three bedroom, water, electric n gas are within a few meters?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- How would you determine whether a change in matter is a physical change or a chemical change?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
- How is it decided whether a road will be called a road, street, avenue or drive?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
Just Added Q & A:
- How many active mobile subscribers are there in China?Best solution by Quora
- How to find the right vacation?Best solution by bookit.com
- How To Make Your Own Primer?Best solution by thekrazycouponlady.com
- How do you get the domain & range?Best solution by ChaCha
- How do you open pop up blockers?Best solution by Yahoo! Answers
For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.
-
Got an issue and looking for advice?
-
Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.
-
Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.
Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.