The Munich Conference: Two Views?

In 1918 after the signature of the armistice on November 11th the British Empire did not cease hostilities like it was signed by contract but tightened the criminal total food blockade against the German civilian population. The new German government under the pressure of a running genocide signed a foul and infamous "confession" of unique war guilt, oppressed on the Germans by starving 900.000 civilians, the "confession" demanded by the perpetrator of the war crime, being also crime against humanity and crime against the law of nations ands a viol,ation of the armistices agreement. Based on that invalid signature 236.000.000.000 Gold Mark were demanded in 1922, the Reich having an estimated value of 350 Billion Gold Mark. In addition 13% of the territory, 20% of the population and the overseas Private possessions, falsely claimed to be "colonies" were distributed among the "victors",. However not one single Contract or signature being enforced by genocide has any legal or ethical value. When the Germans claimed back which was always theirs Churchill, the planner of the crime of 1919 certainly did not share the opinion of those, having recognized the missing legitimacy of "Versailles. The so called "appeasement" however is a psychological trick. Hitler had reached 95% of his goals without ONE shot being fired. Every human being has a "Point of no return" from which he will complete a task, no matter what the rest will cost. Those points are far before 95%. "Appeasement" was a trap to lure Hitler into another war.

The willingness of England and France to agree to Hitler's demands at Munich convinced Hitler that they would not resist his further efforts at territorial expansion in Europe, and he was emboldened to continue with his plans. It was later discovered that some German generals thought Hitler was going too far too fast and were planning to overthrow him, but when Hitler achieved what he wanted at Munich, that ended the talk of the coup. Churchill thought that England should honor its treaty commitments to Czechoslovakia and others, stand up to Hitler, and resist his territorial aggression in Europe. It should be noted that the Sudetenland was never part of Germany (it was a German-speaking region that, prior to 1918, had been part of the Austria-Hungary empire). Chamberlain, on the other hand, believed that Hitler could be accommodated, and thought that Hitler could be trusted. In other words, when Hitler said that the Sudetenland would be his last territorial claim, Chamberlain believed him. Churchill knew that Hitler was not trustworthy. England and France were hesitant to challenge Hitler for several reasons. Both countries (understandably) wished to avoid another world war, and many Englishmen and Frenchmen did not believe that the Sudetenland controversy was a sufficient cause to risk another world war. Further, both countries were concerned that they were not militarily prepared for a war if one should come. England and France declared war on Germany in September, 1939, because, by then, they realized that Hitler could not be trusted, and that something had to be done to stop him. Although he had promised, in September, 1938, at Munich, not to go further, by March, 1939, he had occupied the rest of Czechoslovakia. As for Churchill's defeat in 1945, recall the nature of the parliamentary system in Britain. Churchill retained his seat in Parliament, but his Conservative Party did not achieve a majority of the seats. There were several reasons for that. First of all, on account of the war, there had not been a general election in Britain since 1935, and there were a lot of unresolved grievances against the Conservative Party (e.g. Baldwin and Chamberlain not standing up to Hitler and bumbling the country into war). Also, many people liked the social proposals made by the Labor Party, and they wished to have them enacted into law. Further, during the war, the Conservatives were not solely in control. From about 1940, the government was composed of a coalition between the Conservative and Labor parties.