What does "promotional communication" refer to?

What if normal people, for the sake of clear communication, come up with a new word to refer to the union of?

  • What if normal people, for the sake of clear communication, come up with a new word to refer to the union of one man with one woman. How long will it be before homosexuals demand the "right" to have the same word applied to them, too?

  • Answer:

    Homosexuals would immediately demand the "right" to have the same word applied to them, too. All liberal thought, policy, values and beliefs are based on specific, fundamental and very alluring lies. All liberal rhetoric is justification of those lies. Often the lies come in the form of altering the definition or meanings of words. In every case the change involves easier and guiltless access to some form of vice. They always seek to destroy Christian principles. In the case of homosexuals, the truth lies in wanting access to children. This is where they get recruitment for their lifestyle. There is a narcissistic stage in human development where bonding of the same sex occurs It is between ages of 6 and 14, At this stage when exposed to adult homosexuality, a child is more likely to act on such impulses. As it is right now, homosexuals have exactly the same right to get married as homosexuals. Marriage, being defined as the union of a man and a woman. The alluring lie being perpetrated here is: in assuming the change in the definition of marriage has already occurred, and homosexuals are being denied access to marriage. Nothing can be further from the truth. The definition change would alter tens of thousands of already existing contracts. Liberals would use it to destroy Boy Scouts. They would use it to destroy Conservative Christian churches. This is already being done in other countries.

Home-Sch... at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

If it is recognized in law, it must be so recognized equally. "Separation cannot possibly be equal." -Brown v. Board of Ed. Even if white children left the schools and gave them to black children, that still would not have satisfied the equality requirements of the 14th Amendment. The existence of a separate exclusive institution inherently discriminates simply by it's existence regardless of the rights that each person has access to. Similarly here, it doesn't matter what you call it. The State could abandon the word "marriage" altogether, leaving it to be defined by social and religious institutions, and call all legal life partnerships "civil unions". That would be fine, but if the State recognizes a group that can enter an institution called "marriage', they must not discriminate in that recognition. The same would apply with any other term.

Joe Finkle

In other words, gay people are not normal, in your mind. Words can indeed have multiple meanings. For example, "match" can refer to something we use to light a fire, and to a set of tennis games, and to things that fall into the same category. Crescendo means getting louder in musical notation, but refers to the loudest part in common English. Theory means actual, truthful, proven model of how a system works in science, but in common English refers to an UNPROVEN idea. So, normal people refer to marriage as a union of two people, and you and other abnormal people can make up other definitions for yourself.

Eliot K

yeah, the problem is... you would make up a bunch of extra benefits and privileges to go along with that one word... privileges that no one else had access to...

Dawn of the Zombie g

Let's call it sex.

brown9500v13

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.