Find solution
How is Yahoo doing on Wall Street?

Whats the word for when Occupy Wall Street furthers its agenda with terror?

  • http://news.yahoo.com/more-white-powder-incidents-york-police-see-occupy-174352834--finance.html As you might have heard, Occupy Wall Street sent an unknown white powder envelope to major banks, the mayor of NYC, and Fox News. Although some of these powders are initially believed to be harmless, it is not certain at all if all of them are. Occupy Wall Street even took the time of posting on each letter, "This is a reminder that you are not in control" and "Happy May Day,". My question is: what is it called when groups threaten official societal institutions, such as banks, news corporations, and political institutions? I know there's a word for it. Like, if a vocal minority not only threaten, but possible send volatile substances to not only further their agenda but destabilize society? And, what is it called when this vocal minority attempt to induce "terror" or "fear"? I know it's an -ism. But when -ism would be best associated with "inducing terror", "violent threats to further a vocal minorities' agenda", and "destabilizing society and causing fear and chaos?". I just don't know. My best guess for what -ism could induce so much terror is "marxism" or "liberalism". What other "-ism" could I be thinking of to associate to Occupy Wall Street?

  • Answer:

    OWS has no central leadership, you can't act like the organisation as a whole was involved in this. My question is why you're defending companies on welfare? And why it was okay for the U.S to commit terrorism in Hiroshima and Nagasaki but not for anyone else?

Mike Clarkson at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

Five men, at lease three of them self-described anarchists, have been arrested in an alleged plot to blow up a bridge near Cleveland, the FBI said today. A member of Occupy Cleveland revealed that at least some of the suspects had attended the group's events, sparking concerns that some supporters of the anti-capitalist movement could turn to violence. But there was no danger to the public in the bridge-bombing plot because the explosive devices were inoperable and were controlled by an undercover FBI employee, the agency said. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2137918/Cleveland-Bridge-bomb-plot-Occupy-anarchists-arrested-plotting-blow-Ohio-bridge.html#ixzz1tenJ0QMz

terrorism.

I hate the occupiers! They say that the 1% is stealing from them which I personally hate because if it weren't for 1%, I couldn't have any money to campaign for office!

I see.I see. So now that OWS owns these crazies, does the Tea Party own the TX guy who flew his Cessna into the IRS building? Or the guy who stomped on a woman's head? Or the guy who cut a congressman's brake-line? Or the droves of people who threw bricks through Dem windows? Or the death threats called into congressional offices? Just wanted to see if the same rule applies or if, like the protests themselves, the people involved will be treated completely different depending on which side of an argument they are on.

OWS is a bunch of lazy white kids who are sick of blacks getting all the handouts......

Terrorism.

Muslimism.

mongoloidism, from which you apparently also suffer.

Stupidism,worthless groupism.

Load more

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.