Is There An Easier Way To Count Back Money?

Isn't the fact that mostly men commit crimes that involve money and stuff like,...(discussion style),...?

• ,...robbing homes and stores where they steal jewerly pretty much a reflection that too many men are spending too much money on women these days such as paying for too many dates and buying them jewerly that's too pricey where there's not enough it of that spending the other way around? It was one thing and much more acceptable many years ago, like even as recent as the 1950s for most men to do most of the spending in the relationship because they had more employment and money-making opportunities than women back, the woman needed to be taken care of by the man and the woman was often a house wife. But now, now that women are also having jobs that pay enough to be able to take care of themselves, it's now unfair and wrong for most men to do all the spending. If most men were still making significantly more money than women where they could afford such spending and still have money left over to save in the bank, then it'd be more understandable, but now that men no longer have such an automatic advantage over women in terms of employment and money like they did back in times like the 40s, 50s, and 60s, and probably not to mention even moreso back in the 1800s or the 1700s, it's now wrong for men to do all the spending. Men need to start having women spend money on them. Women need to start doing all the spending on dates and expensive stuff for a change. That money has to come from somewhere, you know, and now that women have those jobs and are even taking those jobs from men, then those same women still expecting men to spend money on them would be like adding insult to injury. Geee, first she takes that high-paying job instead YET NOW she STILL expects him to spend on her when yet she's the one making more money? That's totally wrong. She should spend on him, if anything. And money spent on cosmetics and clothes doesn't count and it's a copout. No one's making those women spend at high-priced stores, they can still be sexy by spending at places like Wal-Mart or K-Mart where the prices are obviously much lower, plus, men usually eat more and therefore usually face a higher food bill so the cost of what can be spent by women at Wal-Mart can equalize how much higher his food bill might be. Even if men act like doing all the spending is not a big deal, deep down, the unfairness probably tears away at them and their subconscious demand for monetary equality can make them more likely to commit crimes such as armed robbery, forgery, burgulary, embezzelment, and any other monetary-raleted crimes, espcially if they don't make enough to drive around in Ferraris and Porches. And no, men should not have to spend money on women to make those women want foreplay and sex with them, those men should be able to make those women want them sexually even without dating, besides, with all of that horrible, unfortunate footage of women making out with women in Youtube videos, look, if women don't need to spend money or date women to fulfill their bisexual fantasies, then since all women should prefer men over women, then by logic, this means that men should also not have to spend money on women either AND should be able to sexually win over women even faster, quicker, and easier than women trying to do the same thing, and even those women persuing women should also prefer men over women as well and be even more willing to get sexual with men instead, and with it obviously also being for free as well. I HATE IT when women french-kiss or make out with each other in any way since they should PREFER doing that stuff with men instead, and those horny men should be getting to do that stuff with those women instead of just watching. Men should not have to be this popular, successful guy whose doing very well for himself to get women like the media shows. Remember Wayne from Wayne's World? Wayne was a popular guy with his own TV show with Garth. Even though Wayne sexually got it on with Cassandra, HE SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD TO have been as popular as he was to make it happen. And men shouldn't have to be successful like Benjamin was in that movie either. Any male headhanger in the crowd should have been able to get sex with Cassandra if they tried. Even poor and working-class men who drive old crappy vehicles should be able to get sex with women easily. Since women can be poor or working class and still get men, even men who are successful, then by God, men should also be able to get women, even successful women who are also poor or working class and who also drive old crappy vehicles. Men deserve to have it just as good as women can have it. Mens' happiness and goals in life are just as important as womens', including their sex lives and the fact that they shouldn't have to resort to monetary-related crimes either.. Am I the only one who realizes this, or do others totally understand what I'm saying and also agree with me? I hope there are also man

• Answer:

  Crimes are often the result of desperation. A good man may rob someone to feed his starving family. However a woman with a horrible personality won't commit a crime if she can just leach off of someone else.