Do you like the show The Big Bang Theory?

Does anyone else think The Big Bang Theory (not the TV show,) is stupid?

  • When I say The Big Bang Theory is stupid, I get labelled as religious. But it has nothing to do with religion, I just don't buy it. We humans, have gone as far as the moon. We've never orbited the nearest Alpha Centauri. We've never been outside the Solar the Solar System. We've never been been to Mars. But somehow, some scientists claim everything began with a Big Bang. Apparently, calculations from observations made on Earth are sufficient to calculate what happens in the Cosmos, and are enough proof for the "origins of the Universe". But the Big Bang doesn't end there. Apparently, there has been a Big Crunch at some point, or will be one at some point. The story just gets stupider and stupider. It has nothing to do with religion. How can we on Earth have the audacity of thinking we have the answers of the Universe with the Big Bang?

  • Answer:

    Well the thing is that the Big bang is simply a theory. What it comes down to is evidence which has been collected over hundreds of years which all adds up to this current theory (as with all theories). We have measured the distance to various stars and other objects in the sky, as well as their velocities relative to earth which seem to confirm the theory of a big bang (i.e. it started at a central point and is now being thrust outwards). Despite this pile up of evidence it is still a THEORY. You and many other people have the right to question this theory until enough evidence is provided that it becomes refuted or irrefutable. Regarding a 'big crunch' it has somewhat recently been proven that the universe is expanding at an increasing rate, which means that a 'big crunch' will never happen. You ask how we could have the audacity to think we have the answers of the universe with the big bang. In that we don't at all. We still don't have a reliable theory for why the big bang happened or what most of the mass of the universe is or what is causing the universe to continue to expand. We only try to explain what we see around us. And the Big Band Theory is a long way from being the answers of the universe. Just my thoughts.

Swimmer8... at Yahoo! Answers Visit the source

Was this solution helpful to you?

Other answers

We don't need to be everywhere to know what goes on in the universe. The evidence for the Big Bang is not stupid, it is real. No, a theory is not just made up, it's based on observation and experimentation. The Big Bang theory has a wide body of evidence and a long track record of making solid predictions that support it. It has nothing to do with what seems right to us. Basically, if the evidence fits the theory, you stick with that until new evidence is found which supports a different theory. So far, there is nothing to contradict the Big Bang, and everything to support it. It's not making things up, it's making sense of what we see.

Lodar of the Hill People

No scientist worthy of the name would claim that the big bang IS reality. But the fact is the the big bang theory is the very best theory that we have today to explain all known observations. If you can find one, just one, observation that is peer reviewed and repeatable which contradicts the big bang theory then you are headed for a Nobel Prize, because in almost a century of scientific research by thousands of professional scientists of all nationalities and denominations, no such observation has ever been found. Hence the big band theory stands as the best and most accepted and best supported theory that we have today. There is a principle called the Copernican principle that states that the universe is pretty much the same everywhere and we do not live in a particularly special part of it. Hence it is NOT necessary to look everywhere, our immediate neighbourhood suffices. Once again the Copernican Principle is consistent with all known evidence. There is a certain amount of arrogance in some circles about who knows what. History would seem to indicate that a little humiliyt is in order. The truth is that ultimately we may have to accept that for fundamental reasons, there are some things we can never know. That being so, it is entirely possible that the big bang theory is not only the best theory we have, it is the best we will ever have. A theory that is not constrained by observation is not a theory. It is fantasy. Big bang is by far the best and most well observationally supported theory we have. Cheers!

Quadrillian

because of the background radiation and the expansion of our universe, yes other people think that the big bang theory is stupid, but those people themselves are stupid

Control

Please list your qualifications as a cosmologist, astrophysicist, physicist, theoretical physicist, and as a leading authority in quantum mechanics. Once you've done so, people who have even a rudimentary understanding of the above disciplines might accept your mindless rant. Never fails to amaze me how many people who don't know what they're talking about insist on blissfully exhibiting that ignorance. Look out, Stephen Hawking...here comes your replacement.

Beau Garrett

and I might add....even christians can believe in the big bang THEORY. I believe in God and I believe in the big bang. The thing is........God made it happen that way. If it would have happened another way,science would say....oh ...this is what happened,but still god made it happen. Just because it started at a point and blew up and has been expanding ever since doesn't mean there is not a God. people are so retarded.

comethunter

It has something to do with evidence, i.e. we actually have evidence that the big bang happened roughly the way we think it did (of course the fact that most people don't actually know what the Big Bang Theory says doesn't help matters much). We also don't think we have all the answers, only some of them, there are still many questions we haven't managed to find an answer for. The Big Crunch is a proposal for what might happen in the future and current observations make it seem unlikely, some have proposed that there may have been previous big crunches but given that one looks unlikely that doesn't seem very likely.

bestonnet_00

Science is like a good detective story. You look at a problem, like a missing diamond or a murder and try to collect clues... a smudged fingerprint... a partially erased message on an answering machine... the butler is wearing a really expensive silk tie... and you try to come up with an explanation that matches all the data. If the evidence says "The butler did it" you CAN if you like say "That's stupid" but you had better have an explanation that matches the evidence ready. The Big Bang matches the data. Sure, it doesn't explain what happened BEFORE the expansion, but that's not what it is supposed to do. What is your obsession with traveling to Alpha Centauri and Mars? Let me tell you a secret. Humans may someday figure out the origin of the Universe, but they are VERY UNLIKELY to EVER travel to Alpha Centauri.

Faesson

yup ur religious its a possibility that's what started everything but if u don't believe i guess god made it happen

dallas

Here's a hint: It's not the story that's getting stupider and stupider.

Bulldog Drummond

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.