Which country is surrounded totally surrounded by MILLIONS n MILLIONS n MILLIONS n MILLIONS of MUSLIMS MUSLIMS?

Muslims........do u deserve all this???????

• well let me just tell the ppl who are reading this currently......tat i will not delete any answer and all i want to hear are ur views and opinions over a very sensitive topic for indians... i m myself....arvind just 17...and proud to be a hindu and a indian now look...the UPA goverenement is willing to pass out the minority equality bill which states over 15% reservation in all walks for muslims.... okay..first of all let me first clear u some facts tat india is a country of over 80% hindus tat account to nearly 100 crores....is this all justified?????? the muslims which always hate the majority of indian population,do they all deserve this special treatment... the muslims which are a dear vote bank for all ************* political parties are being well fed............is this all justified to give special treatment for the ppl which bomb all other ppl who refuse to lift their asses 5 times a day!!!!!!and always think tat who dont act like them are "kafirs" is this justified to give them special treatement like haj ticket susidies by a country with a overwhelming hindu population??????? and moreover............still they complain they are given step motherly treatment now let me just tell u the treatment they offered to us.. Aurangzeb (1658-1707) did not just build an isolated mosque on a destroyed temple, he ordered ALL temples destroyed, among them the Kashi Vishvanath, one of the most sacred places of Hinduism and had mosques built on a number of cleared temples sites. All other Hindu sacred places within his reach equally suffered destruction, with mosques built on them. A few examples: Krishna's birth temple in Mathura, the rebuilt Somnath temple on the coast of Gujurat, the Vishnu temple replaced with the Alamgir mosque now overlooking Benares and the Treta-ka-Thakur temple in Ayodhya. (Neg 60). The number of temples destroyed by Aurangzeb is counted in 4, if not 5 figures; according to his own official court chronicles: "Aurangzeb ordered all provincial governors to destroy all schools and temples of the Pagans and to make a complete end to all pagan teachings and practices". The chronicle sums up the destructions like this: "Hasan Ali Khan came and said that 172 temples in the area had been destroyed. .. His majesty went to Chittor and 63 temples were destroyed..Abu Tarab, appointed to destroy the idol-temples of Amber, reported that 66 temples had been razed to the ground".. Aurangzeb did not stop at destroying temples, their users were also wiped-out; even his own brother, Dara Shikoh, was executed for taking an interest in Hindu religion and the Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur was beheaded because he objected to Aurangzeb's forced conversions. As we can see Romila Thapar and Percival Spear's statement of a benevolent Aurangzeb is a flagrant attempt at negationism. Even the respectable Encyclopedia Brittannica in its entry on India, does not mention in its chapter on the Sultanate period any persecutions of Hindus by Muslims, except "that Firuz Shah Tughlaq made largely unsuccessful attempts at converting his Hindu subjects and sometime persecuted them". The British, for their own selfish purpose, were of course greatly responsible for whitewashing the Muslims, whom they needed to counterbalance the influence of the Hindus and the Congress. It is sad that Jawaharlal Nehru and the Congress perpetuated that brand of negationism. But that is another story. The happiest in this matter must be the Muslims themselves. What fools these Hindus are, they must be telling themselves: We killed them by the millions, we wrested a whole nation out of them, we engineer riots against them, and they still defend us!... But don't the Hindus know that many orthodox Indian Muslims still cling to the Deoband school, which says that India was once "Dar-ul-Islam", the house of Islam, and should return to that status. Maulana Abul Kala Azad, several times Congress President, and Education Minister in free India, was a spokesman for this school. The Aligarh school on the contrary, led by Mohammed Iqbal, propounded the creation of Pakistan. What particularly interests us in the Aligarh school is the attempt by Muslim historians, such as Mohamed Habiib, to rewrite the Chapter of Muslim invasions in India. In 1920, Habib started writing his magnum opus, which he based on four theories: 1) that the records (written by the Muslims themselves) of slaughters of Hindus, the enslaving of their women and children and razing of temples were "mere exaggerations by court poets and zealous chroniclers to please their rulers". 2) That they were indeed atrocities, but mainly committed by Turks, the savage riders from the Steppe. 3) That the destruction of the temples took place because Hindus stored their gold and jewels inside them and therefore Muslim armies plundered these. 4) That the conversion of millions of Hindus to Islam was not forced, "but what happened was there was a shift of opinion in the popu

• Answer:

  i disagree wth u..u r thinkin india is meant for hindu's n pak for muslims being a muslim i never say or support pak i am true indian by heart .india doesn't have a religion thts the best part of india.. we all r indian no matter wat our religion is.. india has many religions we all no..india has to think for its whole population not jast one caste or religion .. i am living outside india bt i support india.. i never say muslims have problm living in india..i am not saying this coz i am a muslim ....yeah iam a muslim but an indian muslim..how can u say tht..people like u create misunderstanding my friend its time u think n b more mature.. i have hindu friends .. n we all r like brothers and sisters...plzz grow up india is a democratic country... ok tell me y ..frm years cong is winning coz everyone understands ibdia is for muslims hindus sikhs n christians